ArticleJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology2022
Factors affecting cognitive dysfunction screening for Latinx adults with type 2 diabetes.
Article in Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subjective Cognitive Dysfunction in Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.Western journal of nursing research · 2024Pooled it
- Maintaining cognitive gains in type 2 diabetes: Barriers, supports, and patterns of strategy use.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To examine influences on screening of Latinx adults with type 2 diabetes for cognitive problems by identifying patient-, clinician-, and clinic-level factors. Methods: This was a mixed methods study consisting of semi-structured interviews with Latinx adults with type 2 diabetes ( Results: For the interviewed patients, screening was important, but inability to work related to a possible diagnosis of dementia was a concern. Both providers and patients agreed that other health issues (e.g., hyperglycemia) took precedence over cognitive screening. Providers (96.7%) were expected to screen patients but lacked clinic support and time; they relied on patients for initial prompts. Only one clinic required staff education on cognitive screening, with an emphasis on potential cultural differences in test results and adequate resources related to dementia for Latinx adults. Conclusions: Clinics serving Latinx adults have a responsibility to deliver appropriate care. Leadership should consider innovative practices such as the creation, with patients, of educational materials for screening-a need highlighted by most participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.