ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
Adherence to appointments for gestational diabetes testing and experiences with two-hour postprandial glucose test: a mixed-methods study in Ghana.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The health consequences of informal employment among female workers and their children: a systematic review.Globalization and health · 2023Pooled it
- Anxiety and depressive symptom experiences in the perinatal period: samples of two different countries.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Patient and contextual factors influence clinicians' decision making regarding universal screening for gestational diabetes: results of a factorial survey set in rural and remote Western Australia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Comparative differences in metabolic, mental health and perinatal outcomes of women with gestational diabetes in Ghana and Switzerland: the G-MUM study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- Oral glucose tolerance test-The imperfect gold standard for gestational diabetes screening: A qualitative study involving clinicians in regional, rural and remote areas of Western Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
- Patient-Centred Gestational Diabetes Care: Preference Elicitation Methods and Machine Learning Innovations.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFailure to attend scheduled appointments is a common problem in healthcare. In obstetrics, diagnostic and treatment protocols for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) require client booking, test preparations, management and follow-up reviews. We identified the socio-demographic, obstetric and medical drivers influencing adherence to appointments for GDM testing and experiences of pregnant women's regarding performing oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
methodsA convergent parallel mixed-methods study comprising a cross-sectional survey and an explorative qualitative descriptive design were used. We recruited 817 women in their first trimester of pregnancy from the antenatal clinics of primary, secondary and tertiary health facilities in Ghana. After obtaining their demographic and health history, we scheduled them for 2-h OGTT between 24 and 28 gestational weeks and estimated the odds of returning for the test. In the qualitative phase, we called 166 participants to ascertain why they failed to report. Also, we had in-depth and focused group discussions with 60 postpartum women who performed the OGTT to explore their experiences with the test.
resultsOut of 817 pregnant women scheduled, 490 (59.97%) reported of which 54.59, 54.33 and 53.24% completed fasting plasma glucose, 1-h and 2-h OGTT, respectively. Maternal age above 35 years (OR: 3.56, 95% CI:1.49-8.47), secondary education (OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.19-8.69), formal sector employment (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.16-3.51) and having same-sex children (OR: 4.37, 95% CI: 1.98-9.66) increased odds of appointment adherence whereas healthcare in a tertiary hospital (OR:0.46, 95% CI:0.22-0.96), rural residence (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34-0.85) and being overweight (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25-0.78) decreased the likelihood. Experiences were thematized into feelings about test procedure, acceptability of test, skillfulness of the health workers and information on the test. Despite the apprehension and discomforts associated with the test, the desire to know one's disease status was the chief motivation. Empathy, reassurance and receiving ample information on the test procedures eased anxiety and improved test compliance.
conclusionsAlthough 40% of participants scheduled did not return, the test was generally acceptable. Socio-cultural underpinnings influenced the health-seeking behaviors, meaning that health worker interactions on test procedures need to be sensitive to the woman's situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.