Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35390116›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of hypertension2022

Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Goals: Evidence for Cardiovascular Protection From Observational Studies and Clinical Trials.

Paul K Whelton, Joshua D Bundy, Robert M Carey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of hypertension, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul K WheltonDepartment of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2225-383X
Joshua D BundyDepartment of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Robert M CareyDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Tulane University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Spatiotemporal transregulation of D1-like angiotensin receptors in genetically...P01HL074940 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI FELDER, ROBIN A · 2004 to 2020
$31.8M
Tulane COBRE in Cardiometabolic Diseases Clinical Research CoreP20GM109036 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Katherine Teresa Mills · 2016 to 2026
$25.3M
Tulane Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH)K12HD043451 · NICHD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI KROUSEL-WOOD, MARIE · 2002 to 2023
$9.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL074940NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109036NIH HHS K12HD043451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have consistently identified a strong, progressive relationship between blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, in a range of systolic BP (SBP) from as low as 90 mm Hg to as high as 180 mm Hg. Clinical trials have demonstrated greater prevention of CVD with more compared with less intensive antihypertensive drug treatment. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials provide strong evidence for more intensive antihypertensive drug therapy down to an SBP of 130 mm Hg, and to an SBP 120-124 mm Hg in the meta-analysis with the greatest statistical power. In the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) randomization to an SBP treatment goal of <120 mm Hg compared with <140 mm Hg in persons with high CVD risk not only reduced the rate of CVD but also all-cause mortality. These benefits were noted in all of the prestated subgroups of interest, including those ≥65 years of age at baseline. In addition, cognitive impairment was less common in those randomized to the intensive compared with standard treatment. Most clinical practice guidelines recommend an SBP treatment target <130 mm Hg in adults with a high risk of CVD, which is the norm for many patients seen in clinical practice, especially those who are older, have diabetes mellitus, or chronic kidney disease.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsAntihypertensive Agentsantihypertensive treatmentblood pressureblood pressure targetsblood pressure treatmentguidelineshypertensionintensive antihypertensive treatment

Identifiers

PMID35390116
PMCPMC9629457
OpenAlexW4226167996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.