Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35391949›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Social Relationship Prediction Integrating Personality Traits and Asymmetric Interactions.

Chunhua Ju, Geyao Li, Fuguang Bao, Ting Gao, Yiling Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Novel Credible Carbon Footprint Traceability System for Low Carbon Economy Using Blockchain Technology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chunhua JuModern Business Research Center, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Geyao LiSchool of Management and E-Business, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Fuguang BaoModern Business Research Center, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Ting GaoSchool of Management and E-Business, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yiling ZhuSchool of Foreign Languages, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Gongshang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social networks have become an important way for users to find friends and expand their social circle. Social networks can improve users' experience by recommending more suitable friends to them. The key lies in improving the accuracy of link prediction, which is also the main research issue of this study. In the study of personality traits, some scholars have proved that personality can be used to predict users' behavior in social networks. Based on these studies, this study aims to improve the accuracy of link prediction in directed social networks. Considering the integration of personality link preference and asymmetric interaction into the link prediction model of social networks, a four-dimensional link prediction model is proposed. Through comparative experiments, it is proved that the four-dimensional social relationship prediction model proposed in this study is more accurate than the model only based on similarity. At the same time, it is also verified that the matching degree of personality link preference and asymmetric interaction intensity in the model can help improve the accuracy of link prediction.

Indexed as

asymmetric interactionego-networkpersonality traitssocial networksocial relationship prediction

Identifiers

PMID35391949
PMCPMC8979791
OpenAlexW4221020049

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.