Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35392853›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Women's preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment.

Elizabeth M Camacho, Rebecca Smyth, Valentina Actis Danna, Deborah Kimaro, Flora Kuzenza, Rose Laisser, Paschal Mdoe, Livuka Nsemwa, Happiness Shayo, Tina Lavender

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth M CamachoSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. elizabeth.camacho@manchester.ac.uk.
Rebecca SmythSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Valentina Actis DannaCentre for Childbirth, Women's and Newborn Health, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Deborah KimaroCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Flora KuzenzaCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Rose LaisserCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Paschal MdoeDepartment of Research, Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Mbulu, Tanzania.
Livuka NsemwaCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Happiness ShayoCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Tina LavenderCentre for Childbirth, Women's and Newborn Health, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBHaydom Lutheran Hospital · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe stillbirth rate in Tanzania remains high. Greater engagement with antenatal care may help to reduce stillbirths. We investigated which characteristics of antenatal care clinics are preferred by pregnant women in Tanzania.

methodsWe conducted an unlabelled discrete choice experiment (DCE) with think-aloud interviews. Participants were pregnant women, regardless of parity/gestation, from the Mwanza and Manyara regions of Tanzania. We asked participants to choose which of two hypothetical antenatal clinics they would rather attend. Clinics were described in terms of transport mode, cleanliness, comfort, visit content, and staff attitude. Each participant made 12 choices during the experiment, and a purposively selected sub-set simultaneously verbalised the rationale for their choices. We analysed DCE responses using a multinomial logit model adjusted for study region, and think-aloud data using the Framework approach.

resultsWe recruited 251 participants split evenly between the 2 geographical regions. Staff attitude was the most important attribute in clinic choice and dominated the think-aloud narratives. Other significant attributes were mode of transport (walking was preferred) and content of clinic visit (preference was stronger with each additional element of care provided). Cleanliness of the clinic was not a significant attribute overall and the think-aloud exercise identified a willingness to trade-off cleanliness and comfort for respectful care.

conclusionWomen would prefer to attend a clinic with kind staff which they can access easily. This study suggests that exploration of barriers to providing respectful care, and enabling staff to deliver it, are important areas for future investment. The DCE shows us what average preferences are; antenatal care that is aligned with identified preferences should increase uptake and engagement versus care which does not acknowledge them.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePrenatal CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansPatient PreferencePregnancyRespectTanzaniaAntenatal careDiscrete choice experimentMaternity services

Identifiers

PMID35392853
PMCPMC8991681
OpenAlexW4223643640

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.