ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2022
Electron microscopy of cardiac 3D nanodynamics: form, function, future.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local calcium dynamics and signalling in cardiomyocytes.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Mechanical Modeling of Cardiac Fibrosis With Explicit Spatial Representation of Cellular Structure and Collagen Alignment.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- A transmission electron microscopy platform for assessing mitochondrial and nuclear architecture in cardiomyocytes.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial ultrastructural pathology in diabetic cardiomyopathy: integrated analysis via scanning electron microscopy and 3D visualization imaging.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Nonmyocytes as electrophysiological contributors to cardiac excitation and conduction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Review
- The heterocellular heart: identities, interactions, and implications for cardiology.Basic research in cardiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 3D nanostructure of the heart, its dynamic deformation during cycles of contraction and relaxation, and the effects of this deformation on cell function remain largely uncharted territory. Over the past decade, the first inroads have been made towards 3D reconstruction of heart cells, with a native resolution of around 1 nm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.