Evidence mapPaperPMID 35397638Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2022

The effect of intranasal insulin on appetite and mood in women with and without obesity: an experimental medicine study.

Elizabeth Schneider, Maartje S Spetter, Elizabeth Martin, Elizabeth Sapey, Kay Por Yip, Konstantinos N Manolopoulos, Abd A Tahrani, Jason M Thomas, Michelle Lee, Manfred Hallschmid and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metabolic underpinnings of cancer-related fatigue.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth SchneiderSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Maartje S SpetterSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Elizabeth MartinSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Elizabeth SapeyBirmingham Acute Care Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Kay Por YipBirmingham Acute Care Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Konstantinos N ManolopoulosInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-6090
Abd A TahraniInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jason M ThomasSchool of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7013-8994
Michelle LeeDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Manfred HallschmidDepartment of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-1106
Pia RotshteinSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Colin T DourishP1vital Ltd., Wallingford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3403-6330
Suzanne HiggsSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. s.higgs.1@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9225-7692
University of Birmingham · GBAston University · GBDeutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. · DEHR Wallingford · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N008847/1Medical Research Council MC_PC_21015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesIntranasal (IN) administration of insulin decreases appetite in humans, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear, and it is unknown whether IN insulin affects the food intake of women with obesity. SUBJECTS/

methodsIn a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design, participants (35 lean women and 17 women with obesity) were randomized to receive 160 IU/1.6 mL of IN insulin or placebo in a counterbalanced order in the post prandial state. The effects of IN insulin on cookie intake, appetite, mood, food reward, cognition and neural activity were assessed.

resultsIN insulin in the post prandial state reduced cookie intake, appetite and food reward relative to placebo and these effects were more pronounced for women with obesity compared with lean women. IN insulin also improved mood in women with obesity. In both BMI groups, IN insulin increased neural activity in the insula when viewing food pictures. IN insulin did not affect cognitive function.

conclusionsThese results suggest that IN insulin decreases palatable food intake when satiated by reducing food reward and that women with obesity may be more sensitive to this effect than lean women. Further investigation of the therapeutic potential of IN insulin for weight management in women with obesity is warranted.

Indexed as

AppetiteBiomedical ResearchAdministration, IntranasalDouble-Blind MethodEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansInsulinObesityInsulin

Identifiers

PMID35397638
PMCPMC9239904
OpenAlexW4223529453

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.