Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35403737›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2022

3D imaging for driving cancer discovery.

Ravian L van Ineveld, Esmée J van Vliet, Ellen J Wehrens, Maria Alieva, Anne C Rios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multidimensional Imaging of Breast Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ravian L van Ineveld *Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Esmée J van Vliet *Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9301-1598
Ellen J Wehrens *Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maria AlievaPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anne C RiosPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9082-8068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the cellular composition and architecture of cancer has primarily advanced using 2D models and thin slice samples. This has granted spatial information on fundamental cancer biology and treatment response. However, tissues contain a variety of interconnected cells with different functional states and shapes, and this complex organization is impossible to capture in a single plane. Furthermore, tumours have been shown to be highly heterogenous, requiring large-scale spatial analysis to reliably profile their cellular and structural composition. Volumetric imaging permits the visualization of intact biological samples, thereby revealing the spatio-phenotypic and dynamic traits of cancer. This review focuses on new insights into cancer biology uniquely brought to light by 3D imaging and concomitant progress in cancer modelling and quantitative analysis. 3D imaging has the potential to generate broad knowledge advance from major mechanisms of tumour progression to new strategies for cancer treatment and patient diagnosis. We discuss the expected future contributions of the newest imaging trends towards these goals and the challenges faced for reaching their full application in cancer research.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalNeoplasmsHumans3D imagingarchival tissuecancer biologycancer (immuno)therapy

Identifiers

PMID35403737
PMCPMC9108604

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.