Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35405874›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Extensive Sheep and Goat Production: The Role of Novel Technologies towards Sustainability and Animal Welfare.

Severiano R Silva, Laura Sacarrão-Birrento, Mariana Almeida, David M Ribeiro, Cristina Guedes, José Ramiro González Montaña, Alfredo F Pereira, Konstantinos Zaralis, Ana Geraldo, Ouranios Tzamaloukas and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Effect of Environment and Husbandry Practices on Sheep Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  10. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Bioactive Compounds fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Decision support system forFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  19. Australian Alpaca Demographics and Management: A National Survey.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Severiano R SilvaVeterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), Associate Laboratory of Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7045-2075
Laura Sacarrão-BirrentoLEAF Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6416-9268
Mariana AlmeidaVeterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), Associate Laboratory of Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0482-5459
David M RibeiroLEAF Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0990-7739
Cristina GuedesVeterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), Associate Laboratory of Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8390-4907
José Ramiro González MontañaMedicine, Surgery and Anatomy Veterinary Department, Veterinary Faculty, University of León, 24071 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8976-3332
Alfredo F PereiraMediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Universidade de Évora, Apartado 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9430-9399
Konstantinos ZaralisDepartment of Agriculture, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Western Macedonia, 53100 Florina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1959-3689
Ana GeraldoMediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Universidade de Évora, Apartado 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.
Ouranios TzamaloukasDepartment of Agricultural Sciences Biotechnology and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol 3036, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-7675-6718
Marta González CabreraAnimal Production and Biotechnology Group, Institute of Animal Health and Food Safety, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35413 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9735-2162
Noemí CastroAnimal Production and Biotechnology Group, Institute of Animal Health and Food Safety, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35413 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3026-2031
Anastasio ArgüelloAnimal Production and Biotechnology Group, Institute of Animal Health and Food Safety, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35413 Arucas, Spain.
Lorenzo E Hernández-CastellanoAnimal Production and Biotechnology Group, Institute of Animal Health and Food Safety, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35413 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2729-0434
Ángel J Alonso-DiezMedicine, Surgery and Anatomy Veterinary Department, Veterinary Faculty, University of León, 24071 León, Spain.
María J MartínDepartment of Animal Science, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2888-0778
Luis G Cal-PereyraPathology Department, Veterinary Faculty, University of La República, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-0533-0530
George StilwellCIISA-Animal Behaviour and Welfare Laboratory, Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3733-3223
André M de AlmeidaLEAF Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sheep and goat extensive production systems are very important in the context of global food security and the use of rangelands that have no alternative agricultural use. In such systems, there are enormous challenges to address. These include, for instance, classical production issues, such as nutrition or reproduction, as well as carbon-efficient systems within the climate-change context. An adequate response to these issues is determinant to economic and environmental sustainability. The answers to such problems need to combine efficiently not only the classical production aspects, but also the increasingly important health, welfare, and environmental aspects in an integrated fashion. The purpose of the study was to review the application of technological developments, in addition to remote-sensing in tandem with other state-of-the-art techniques that could be used within the framework of extensive production systems of sheep and goats and their impact on nutrition, production, and ultimately, the welfare of these species. In addition to precision livestock farming (PLF), these include other relevant technologies, namely omics and other areas of relevance in small-ruminant extensive production: heat stress, colostrum intake, passive immunity, newborn survival, biomarkers of metabolic disease diagnosis, and parasite resistance breeding. This work shows the substantial, dynamic nature of the scientific community to contribute to solutions that make extensive production systems of sheep and goats more sustainable, efficient, and aligned with current concerns with the environment and welfare.

Indexed as

extensivegoatomicsPLFsheeptechnologywelfare

Identifiers

PMID35405874
PMCPMC8996830

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.