Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406474›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Unravelling Prostate Cancer Heterogeneity Using Spatial Approaches to Lipidomics and Transcriptomics.

Shadrack M Mutuku, Xander Spotbeen, Paul J Trim, Marten F Snel, Lisa M Butler, Johannes V Swinnen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in spatial omics for the analysis of prostate cancer.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Special Issue "The Role of Lipids in Health and Diseases".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Targeting lipid metabolism in metastatic prostate cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shadrack M MutukuAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6285-9895
Xander SpotbeenLaboratory of Lipid Metabolism and Cancer, Leuven Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-967X
Paul J TrimAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8734-3433
Marten F SnelAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Lisa M ButlerAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2698-3220
Johannes V SwinnenLaboratory of Lipid Metabolism and Cancer, Leuven Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7720-5077
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to advances in the detection and management of prostate cancer over the past 20 years, most cases of localised disease are now potentially curable by surgery or radiotherapy, or amenable to active surveillance without treatment. However, this has given rise to a new dilemma for disease management; the inability to distinguish indolent from lethal, aggressive forms of prostate cancer, leading to substantial overtreatment of some patients and delayed intervention for others. Driving this uncertainty is the critical deficit of novel targets for systemic therapy and of validated biomarkers that can inform treatment decision-making and to select and monitor therapy. In part, this lack of progress reflects the inherent challenge of undertaking target and biomarker discovery in clinical prostate tumours, which are cellularly heterogeneous and multifocal, necessitating the use of spatial analytical approaches. In this review, the principles of mass spectrometry-based lipid imaging and complementary gene-based spatial omics technologies, their application to prostate cancer and recent advancements in these technologies are considered. We put in perspective studies that describe spatially-resolved lipid maps and metabolic genes that are associated with prostate tumours compared to benign tissue and increased risk of disease progression, with the aim of evaluating the future implementation of spatial lipidomics and complementary transcriptomics for prognostication, target identification and treatment decision-making for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

biomarkerslipidomicslipidsMALDImass spectrometry imagingmetabolomicsprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35406474
PMCPMC8997139
OpenAlexW4221117442

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.