Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35406950›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Machine Learning for Plant Stress Modeling: A Perspective towards Hormesis Management.

Amanda Kim Rico-Chávez, Jesus Alejandro Franco, Arturo Alfonso Fernandez-Jaramillo, Luis Miguel Contreras-Medina, Ramón Gerardo Guevara-González, Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-Escobedo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Antioxidant and drought-acclimation responses in UV-B-exposed transgenic Nicotiana tabacum displaying constitutive overproduction of HPhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Artificial neural network modeling for deciphering the in vitro induced salt stress tolerance in chickpea (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda Kim Rico-ChávezUnidad de Ingeniería en Biosistemas, Facultad de Ingeniería Campus Amazcala, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Carretera Chichimequillas, s/n km 1, El Marqués CP 76265, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-6859
Jesus Alejandro FrancoEscuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Juriquilla, UNAM, Querétaro CP 76230, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7161-3141
Arturo Alfonso Fernandez-JaramilloUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Sinaloa, Carretera Municipal Libre Mazatlán Higueras km 3, Col. Genaro Estrada, Mazatlán CP 82199, Mexico.
Luis Miguel Contreras-MedinaUnidad de Ingeniería en Biosistemas, Facultad de Ingeniería Campus Amazcala, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Carretera Chichimequillas, s/n km 1, El Marqués CP 76265, Mexico.
Ramón Gerardo Guevara-GonzálezUnidad de Ingeniería en Biosistemas, Facultad de Ingeniería Campus Amazcala, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Carretera Chichimequillas, s/n km 1, El Marqués CP 76265, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5748-7097
Quetzalcoatl Hernandez-EscobedoEscuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Juriquilla, UNAM, Querétaro CP 76230, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2981-7036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant stress is one of the most significant factors affecting plant fitness and, consequently, food production. However, plant stress may also be profitable since it behaves hormetically; at low doses, it stimulates positive traits in crops, such as the synthesis of specialized metabolites and additional stress tolerance. The controlled exposure of crops to low doses of stressors is therefore called hormesis management, and it is a promising method to increase crop productivity and quality. Nevertheless, hormesis management has severe limitations derived from the complexity of plant physiological responses to stress. Many technological advances assist plant stress science in overcoming such limitations, which results in extensive datasets originating from the multiple layers of the plant defensive response. For that reason, artificial intelligence tools, particularly Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL), have become crucial for processing and interpreting data to accurately model plant stress responses such as genomic variation, gene and protein expression, and metabolite biosynthesis. In this review, we discuss the most recent ML and DL applications in plant stress science, focusing on their potential for improving the development of hormesis management protocols.

Indexed as

agricultural engineeringcrop improvementeustressintelligent algorithms

Identifiers

PMID35406950
PMCPMC9003083

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.