Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35407541›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Inconsistencies and Ambiguities in Liver-Disease-Related Contraindications-A Systematic Analysis of SmPCs/PI of Major Drug Markets.

Laura Weisbach, Anna K Schuster, Michael Hartmann, Martin F Fromm, Renke Maas, Katrin Farker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura WeisbachHospital Pharmacy, University Center for Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacoeconomics, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Anna K SchusterHospital Pharmacy, University Center for Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacoeconomics, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Michael HartmannHospital Pharmacy, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Martin F FrommInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91504 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0334-7478
Renke MaasInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91504 Erlangen, Germany.
Katrin FarkerHospital Pharmacy, University Center for Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacoeconomics, Jena University Hospital, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01ZZ1910C and 01ZZ1910O
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver disease is a common condition worldwide that can cause alterations in drug disposition and susceptibility to drug toxicities, with increased risk of adverse drug reactions. European Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) and United States Prescribing Information (US PI) should therefore be comprehensible to prescribers regarding their liver-associated contraindications to ensure safe prescribing. This study aimed to evaluate the ambiguity of terminology used in communicating liver-associated absolute contraindications in SmPCs/PI of commonly prescribed drugs in four major drug markets (Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States) by assigning wordings to different categories and analyzing their clinical comprehensibility. For US PI, 79% did not contain liver-related contraindications, compared to 2, 13, and 6% of German, Swiss, and British SmPCs, respectively. Study findings indicate that out of 228 examined SmPCs/PI containing liver-related contraindications, 77, 79, 76, and 52% contained unclear wording in the German, Swiss, British, and American drug market, respectively. Only 40% (German), 52% (Swiss), 39% (British), and 29% (American) of SmPCs/PI included terms with explicit wording. Including more precise statements in SmPCs/PI based on laboratory parameters (such as albumin) or scores (e.g., the Child-Pugh score) to objectify the severity of liver disease may improve the clarity of SmPCs/PI and the safety of drug prescription.

Indexed as

drug contraindicationsdrug marketliver diseaseliver-related contraindicationsmedication safetyPIprescribing informationSmPC

Identifiers

PMID35407541
PMCPMC9000103
OpenAlexW4221092165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.