Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35410163›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

Inferring mammalian tissue-specific regulatory conservation by predicting tissue-specific differences in open chromatin.

Irene M Kaplow, Daniel E Schäffer, Morgan E Wirthlin, Alyssa J Lawler, Ashley R Brown, Michael Kleyman, Andreas R Pfenning

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A putativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. UnlockingNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating extensive functional annotations and multiomics of cattle enhances climate resilience prediction and mapping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Context-dependent regulatory variants in Alzheimer's disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Combining Machine Learning and Multiplexed,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. AnFrontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  19. Reconstructing human-specific regulatory functions in model systems.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irene M KaplowDepartment of Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ikaplow@cs.cmu.edu.
Daniel E SchäfferDepartment of Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Morgan E WirthlinDepartment of Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alyssa J LawlerNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ashley R BrownDepartment of Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael KleymanDepartment of Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Andreas R PfenningDepartment of Computational Biology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. apfenning@cmu.edu.
Carnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

Interpreting the regulatory mechanisms underlying the predisposition to substance use disordersDP1DA046585 · NIDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI PFENNING, ANDREAS ROBERT · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA046585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvolutionary conservation is an invaluable tool for inferring functional significance in the genome, including regions that are crucial across many species and those that have undergone convergent evolution. Computational methods to test for sequence conservation are dominated by algorithms that examine the ability of one or more nucleotides to align across large evolutionary distances. While these nucleotide alignment-based approaches have proven powerful for protein-coding genes and some non-coding elements, they fail to capture conservation of many enhancers, distal regulatory elements that control spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression. The function of enhancers is governed by a complex, often tissue- and cell type-specific code that links combinations of transcription factor binding sites and other regulation-related sequence patterns to regulatory activity. Thus, function of orthologous enhancer regions can be conserved across large evolutionary distances, even when nucleotide turnover is high.

resultsWe present a new machine learning-based approach for evaluating enhancer conservation that leverages the combinatorial sequence code of enhancer activity rather than relying on the alignment of individual nucleotides. We first train a convolutional neural network model that can predict tissue-specific open chromatin, a proxy for enhancer activity, across mammals. Next, we apply that model to distinguish instances where the genome sequence would predict conserved function versus a loss of regulatory activity in that tissue. We present criteria for systematically evaluating model performance for this task and use them to demonstrate that our models accurately predict tissue-specific conservation and divergence in open chromatin between primate and rodent species, vastly out-performing leading nucleotide alignment-based approaches. We then apply our models to predict open chromatin at orthologs of brain and liver open chromatin regions across hundreds of mammals and find that brain enhancers associated with neuron activity have a stronger tendency than the general population to have predicted lineage-specific open chromatin.

conclusionThe framework presented here provides a mechanism to annotate tissue-specific regulatory function across hundreds of genomes and to study enhancer evolution using predicted regulatory differences rather than nucleotide-level conservation measurements.

Indexed as

ChromatinEnhancer Elements, GeneticAnimalsHumansMammalsNeural Networks, ComputerNucleotidesChromatinNucleotidesEnhancersGene expression evolutionMachine learningOpen chromatin prediction

Identifiers

PMID35410163
PMCPMC8996547
OpenAlexW4226036499

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.