ArticleBMC genomics2022
Inferring mammalian tissue-specific regulatory conservation by predicting tissue-specific differences in open chromatin.
Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- A putativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- UnlockingNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Fine-mapping candidate neuropsychiatric regulatory variants using cell type-aware comparative genomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Challenges in predicting chromatin accessibility differences between species.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Widespread turnover of a conserved cis-regulatory code across 589 grass species.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Refining sequence-to-activity models by increasing model resolution.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Integrating extensive functional annotations and multiomics of cattle enhances climate resilience prediction and mapping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Motif-based models accurately predict cell type-specific distal regulatory elements.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Challenges in Predicting Chromatin Accessibility Differences between Species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A community effort to optimize sequence-based deep learning models of gene regulation.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Context-dependent regulatory variants in Alzheimer's disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrating Intermediate Traits in Phylogenetic Genotype-to-Phenotype Studies.Integrative and comparative biology · 2025Review
- Combining Machine Learning and Multiplexed,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Evaluating methods for the prediction of cell-type-specific enhancers in the mammalian cortex.Cell genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- Novelty versus innovation of gene regulatory elements in human evolution and disease.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025Review
- AnFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Reconstructing human-specific regulatory functions in model systems.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024Review
- Spatial, transcriptomic, and epigenomic analyses link dorsal horn neurons to chronic pain genetic predisposition.Cell reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvolutionary conservation is an invaluable tool for inferring functional significance in the genome, including regions that are crucial across many species and those that have undergone convergent evolution. Computational methods to test for sequence conservation are dominated by algorithms that examine the ability of one or more nucleotides to align across large evolutionary distances. While these nucleotide alignment-based approaches have proven powerful for protein-coding genes and some non-coding elements, they fail to capture conservation of many enhancers, distal regulatory elements that control spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression. The function of enhancers is governed by a complex, often tissue- and cell type-specific code that links combinations of transcription factor binding sites and other regulation-related sequence patterns to regulatory activity. Thus, function of orthologous enhancer regions can be conserved across large evolutionary distances, even when nucleotide turnover is high.
resultsWe present a new machine learning-based approach for evaluating enhancer conservation that leverages the combinatorial sequence code of enhancer activity rather than relying on the alignment of individual nucleotides. We first train a convolutional neural network model that can predict tissue-specific open chromatin, a proxy for enhancer activity, across mammals. Next, we apply that model to distinguish instances where the genome sequence would predict conserved function versus a loss of regulatory activity in that tissue. We present criteria for systematically evaluating model performance for this task and use them to demonstrate that our models accurately predict tissue-specific conservation and divergence in open chromatin between primate and rodent species, vastly out-performing leading nucleotide alignment-based approaches. We then apply our models to predict open chromatin at orthologs of brain and liver open chromatin regions across hundreds of mammals and find that brain enhancers associated with neuron activity have a stronger tendency than the general population to have predicted lineage-specific open chromatin.
conclusionThe framework presented here provides a mechanism to annotate tissue-specific regulatory function across hundreds of genomes and to study enhancer evolution using predicted regulatory differences rather than nucleotide-level conservation measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.