Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35413593›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2022

Assessment the effect of genomic selection and detection of selective signature in broilers.

Xiaodong Tan, Ranran Liu, Wei Li, Maiqing Zheng, Dan Zhu, Dawei Liu, Furong Feng, Qinghe Li, Li Liu, Jie Wen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Efficiency of Recurrent Genomic Selection in Panmictic Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Trait Analysis in Domestic Rabbits (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaodong TanState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Ranran LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Wei LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Maiqing ZhengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Dan ZhuFoshan Gaoming Xinguang Agricultural and Animal Industrials Corporation, Foshan 528515, China.
Dawei LiuFoshan Gaoming Xinguang Agricultural and Animal Industrials Corporation, Foshan 528515, China.
Furong FengFoshan Gaoming Xinguang Agricultural and Animal Industrials Corporation, Foshan 528515, China.
Qinghe LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Li LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Jie WenState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Guiping ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: zhaoguiping@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to high selection advances and shortened generation interval, genomic selection (GS) is now an effective animal breeding scheme. In broilers, many studies have compared the accuracy of different GS prediction methods, but few reports have demonstrated phenotypic or genetic changes using GS. In this study, the paternal chicken line B underwent continuous selection for 3 generations. The chicken 55 k SNP chip was used to estimate the genetic parameters and detect genomic response regions by selective sweep analysis. The heritability for body weight (BW), meat production, and abdominal fat traits were ranged from 0.12 to 0.38. A high genetic correlation was found between BW and meat production traits, while a low genetic correlation (<0.1) was found between meat production and abdominal fat traits. Selection resulted in an increase of about 516 g in BW and 140 g in breast muscle weight. Percentage of breast muscle and whole thigh were increased 0.8 to 1.5%. No change was observed in abdominal fat percentage. The genomic estimated breeding value advances was positive for BW and meat production (except whole thigh percentage), while negative for abdominal fat percentage. By selective sweep analysis, 39 common chromosomal regions and 102 protein coding genes were found to be influenced, including MYH1A, MYH1B, and MYH1D of the MYH gene family. Tight junction pathway as well as myosin complex related terms were enriched. This study demonstrates the effective use of GS for improvements in BW and meat production in chicken line B. Further, genomic regions, responsive to intensive genetic selection, were identified to contain genes of the MYH family.

Indexed as

ChickensMuscle, SkeletalAbdominal FatAnimalsGenomicsMeatPhenotypeSelection, Geneticbody weightchickengenomic selectionmeat production traitsselective sweep

Identifiers

PMID35413593
PMCPMC9018145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.