Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35422132›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2022

A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study of a Community Health Worker-Delivered Intervention to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk in a Rural, Underserved Non-Hispanic Black Population: The CHANGE Study.

Carmen D Samuel-Hodge, Ziya Gizlice, Sallie D Allgood, Audrina J Bunton, Amber Erskine, Jennifer Leeman, Samuel Cykert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen D Samuel-HodgeGillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Nutrition, Center for Promotion and Disease Prevention, 144822University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3700-7578
Ziya GizliceCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sallie D AllgoodSchool of Nursing, 15776Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0329-4572
Audrina J BuntonCecil G Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Amber ErskineCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer LeemanSchool of Nursing, 144822University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Samuel CykertSchool of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, 144822University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · US

Funding

ACL HHS U48DP005017NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the Carolina Heart Alliance Networking for Greater Equity (CHANGE) Program, an adapted evidence-based cardiovascular disease risk reduction intervention delivered by Community Health Workers (CHW) to rural adults.

designHybrid implementation-effectiveness study with a pre-post design.

settingNorth Carolina Federally Qualified Health Center and local health department in a rural, medically underserved area. SAMPLE: Participants (n = 255) included 87% Non-Hispanic Black with a mean age of 57 years; 84% had diagnosed hypertension, 55% had diabetes, and 65% had hypercholesterolemia.

interventionA CHW-delivered, low-intensity, 4-month behavioral lifestyle intervention promoting a southern-style Mediterranean dietary pattern and physical activity. MEASURES: We measured number and representativeness of participants reached and retained, intervention delivery fidelity, weight, blood pressure, and self-reported dietary and physical activity behaviors. ANALYSIS: Pre-post changes at 4 months were analyzed using paired t-tests.

resultsStudy participants completed 90% of planned intervention contacts; 87% were retained. Intervention delivery fidelity measures showed participants receiving a mean of 3.5 counseling visits, 2.7 booster calls, and on average completing 1.7 modules, setting 1.8 goals, and receiving 1.3 referrals per visit. There were significant mean reductions in systolic (-2.5 mmHg, P < .05) and diastolic blood pressure (-2.1 mmHg, P < .01); the proportion of participants with systolic blood pressure <130 increased by 7 % points (P = .05), and diastolic pressure <80 by 9 percentage points (P < .01). Dietary behaviors improved significantly with average weekly servings of nuts increased by .5 serving (P < .0001), and fruits and vegetables by .8 daily serving (P < .0001). Physical activity also increased on average by 45 min./week (P < .001). Weight did not change significantly.

conclusionsThe CHANGE program showed both implementation and program effectiveness and adds to the evidence supporting CHW-delivered lifestyle interventions to reduce CVD risk among rural, Non-Hispanic Black, and medically underserved populations.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionAdultBlood PressureCommunity Health WorkersHumansMedically Underserved AreaMiddle AgedRural Populationlay health advisorslifestyle interventionNon-Hispanic Blackprevention and controlrural health services

Identifiers

PMID35422132
PMCPMC9198395
OpenAlexW4223920941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.