Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35422396›Full record

ArticleRadiography (London, England : 1995)2022

Impact of COVID-19 on service delivery in radiology and radiotherapy.

S Mc Fadden, T Flood, P Shepherd, T Gilleece

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiography (London, England : 1995), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on DXA waiting lists and osteoporosis prescription trends in England 2019-2023.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S Mc FaddenDiagnostic Radiography and Imaging School of Health Sciences, University of Ulster Shore Road Newtownabbey Co. Antrim, BT37 OQB, UK. Electronic address: s.mcfadden@ulster.ac.uk.
T FloodRadiotherapy and Oncology, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, UK. Electronic address: t.flood@ulster.ac.uk.
P ShepherdRadiotherapy and Oncology, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, UK. Electronic address: PH.Shepherd@ulster.ac.uk.
T GilleeceRadiotherapy and Oncology, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Jordanstown Campus, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, UK. Electronic address: tm.gilleece@ulster.ac.uk.
University of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on radiography services globally. The reshaping of service delivery continues to impact patient management and the experience of the radiography workforce should be evaluated to determine how effective service delivery can be maintained in the ongoing and post-pandemic world.

methodsA mixed methods approach was adopted. Questionnaires, designed using Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) online survey software, were used to survey radiographers throughout Northern Ireland (NI). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with radiography service managers in the NHS and private sector in NI. All interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and coded independently by 2 researchers.

resultsA total of 106 Radiographers completed the online survey i.e. 82 Diagnostic and 24 Therapeutic. Variations were reported regarding staff concern for contracting COVID-19 and passing it on. Clinical workload was reported to fluctuate during the early period of the pandemic, however, both diagnostic and therapeutic radiographers reported workloads which were higher than normal at the time of the data collection. Nine service managers participated in the interviews plus two band 8 superintendent radiographers. Staff faced many challenges whilst delivering services due to COVID-19. The two most frequently cited challenges included issues related to (i) Implementation of PPE and (ii) Changes to work practices.

conclusionA pre-prepared pandemic plan should be established and stress tested for the future. The plan should be devised in consultation with both the public and private sector to determine the very best use of resources. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The radiography workforce has worked continuously throughout the pandemic and needs to be supported to deal with the potential increase in demand for services in the post-pandemic world.

Indexed as

COVID-19RadiologyHumansPandemicsRadiographyWorkforceCOVID-19 pandemicRadiographyRadiography service provisionRadiography workforceRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35422396
PMCPMC8960154
OpenAlexW4221118100

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.