ArticleJournal of neurology2022
Clinical and genetic analyses of 150 patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Familial prrt2-negative paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia mimicking frontal lobe epilepsy: a video-eeg/polygraphic documentation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Genetic and phenotypic analyses of PRRT2 positive and negative paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2024Article
- TMEM151A variants associated with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.Human genetics · 2023Article
- Lamotrigine as an alternative treatment for paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2023Article
- Clinical features and genetic analysis of paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia in children.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMutations in PRRT2 and 16p11.2 microdeletion including PRRT2 have been identified as the pathogenic cause of paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD).
objectiveThe objective was to investigate the clinical and genetic features of PKD and to analyze the genotype-phenotype correlation.
methodsWe recruited PKD patients, recorded clinical manifestations, and performed PRRT2 screening in 150 PKD patients by unified PKD registration forms. Genotype-phenotype correlation analyses were conducted in probands. High-knee-exercise (HKE) tests were applied in one hundred and six patients.
resultsEight PRRT2 mutations were detected, accounting for 22.76% of the probands. Three mutations (c.649dupC, c.649delC, and c.510_513delTCTG) were already reported, while four mutations (c.252_264delCACAGACCTCAGC, c.503_504delCT, c.679C > T, and c.804C > A) were first reported. One heterozygous microdeletion of 606 kb in 16p11.2 was detected in one patient. Compared with non-PRRT2 mutation carriers, the PRRT2 mutation carriers were younger at onset, experienced longer attacks, and tended to present with complicated PKD, combined phenotypes of dystonia and chorea. 57.01% of patients could effectively induce movement disorders through the HKE test. A good response was shown in 81.93% of the patients prescribed with antiepileptic drugs. 13.54% (13/96) had abnormal EEG results.
conclusionsPRRT2 mutations are common in patients with PKD and are significantly associated with an earlier age at onset, longer duration of attacks, a complicated form of PKD, combined phenotypes of dystonia and chorea. Patients with microdeletion of 16p11.2 may have more severe manifestations. The HKE test could contribute to the diagnosis of PKD. Carbamazepine is still the first choice for PKD patients, but individualized treatment should be formulated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.