ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2022
The role of bile acids in carcinogenesis.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
181 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Dysregulation of serum bile acids in liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025Pooled it
- Mechanisms underlying obesity-malignancy connection: a systematic narrative review.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Guideline for designing microbiome studies in neoplastic diseases.GeroScience · 2024Guideline
- Investigating causal links between gallstones, cholecystectomy, and 33 site-specific cancers: a Mendelian randomization post-meta-analysis study.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Metabolomic profiling of upper GI malignancies in blood and tissue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Unmasking the Metabolite Signature of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Future Cancer Risk.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Human gut, breast, and oral microbiome in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Bile acid signaling in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Microbiota-gut-brain axis and bile acids-driven neuromodulation.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Postbiotics Against Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review Bridging Preclinical Evidence with Potential Clinical Application.Cancers · 2026Review
- Interpreting Circulating Bile Acid Profiles in Pancreatic Cancer: The Role of Cholestasis and Its Management.Cancers · 2026Article
- Two Standards-Aided LC-MS Technologies Uncover 30 "Unreported" Compounds in Natural Bear Bile Powder to Add a New Pharmacopoeia Quality-Marker.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Targeting the Human Gut Microbiota-Between Conventional Therapy and Precision Genetic Engineering.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Versatility of TiOACS omega · 2026Article
- CYP8B1 suppressed by Ras/ERK leads to cholesterol accumulation and bile acids reduction and facilitates hepatic tumorigenesis.Cancer & metabolism · 2026Article
- The proteomic differences and expression of fatty acid-binding protein 6 (FABP6) associated with gastrointestinal injury in horses with oral administration of a clinical dose of phenylbutazone.Equine veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Constitutive AMPK activation prevents hepatocellular carcinoma development through inhibition of HNF4α activity.Science advances · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetics and homeostatic impact of golden bile powder: evidence from surrogate analyte-based UPLC-MS/MS in rats.Chinese medicine · 2026Article
121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bile acids are soluble derivatives of cholesterol produced in the liver that subsequently undergo bacterial transformation yielding a diverse array of metabolites. The bulk of bile acid synthesis takes place in the liver yielding primary bile acids; however, other tissues have also the capacity to generate bile acids (e.g. ovaries). Hepatic bile acids are then transported to bile and are subsequently released into the intestines. In the large intestine, a fraction of primary bile acids is converted to secondary bile acids by gut bacteria. The majority of the intestinal bile acids undergo reuptake and return to the liver. A small fraction of secondary and primary bile acids remains in the circulation and exert receptor-mediated and pure chemical effects (e.g. acidic bile in oesophageal cancer) on cancer cells. In this review, we assess how changes to bile acid biosynthesis, bile acid flux and local bile acid concentration modulate the behavior of different cancers. Here, we present in-depth the involvement of bile acids in oesophageal, gastric, hepatocellular, pancreatic, colorectal, breast, prostate, ovarian cancer. Previous studies often used bile acids in supraphysiological concentration, sometimes in concentrations 1000 times higher than the highest reported tissue or serum concentrations likely eliciting unspecific effects, a practice that we advocate against in this review. Furthermore, we show that, although bile acids were classically considered as pro-carcinogenic agents (e.g. oesophageal cancer), the dogma that switch, as lower concentrations of bile acids that correspond to their serum or tissue reference concentration possess anticancer activity in a subset of cancers. Differences in the response of cancers to bile acids lie in the differential expression of bile acid receptors between cancers (e.g. FXR vs. TGR5). UDCA, a bile acid that is sold as a generic medication against cholestasis or biliary surge, and its conjugates were identified with almost purely anticancer features suggesting a possibility for drug repurposing. Taken together, bile acids were considered as tumor inducers or tumor promoter molecules; nevertheless, in certain cancers, like breast cancer, bile acids in their reference concentrations may act as tumor suppressors suggesting a Janus-faced nature of bile acids in carcinogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.