Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35434595›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2022

Peptide-based delivery of therapeutics in cancer treatment.

Timothy Samec, Jessica Boulos, Serena Gilmore, Anthony Hazelton, Angela Alexander-Bryant

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Nucleic acid drugs: recent progress and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Biological Activity of Natural and Synthetic Peptides as Anticancer Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy SamecNanobiotechnology Laboratory, Clemson University, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson, SC, USA.
Jessica BoulosNanobiotechnology Laboratory, Clemson University, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson, SC, USA.
Serena GilmoreNanobiotechnology Laboratory, Clemson University, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson, SC, USA.
Anthony HazeltonNanobiotechnology Laboratory, Clemson University, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson, SC, USA.
Angela Alexander-BryantNanobiotechnology Laboratory, Clemson University, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson, SC, USA.
Clemson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current delivery strategies for cancer therapeutics commonly cause significant systemic side effects due to required high doses of therapeutic, inefficient cellular uptake of drug, and poor cell selectivity. Peptide-based delivery systems have shown the ability to alleviate these issues and can significantly enhance therapeutic loading, delivery, and cancer targetability. Peptide systems can be tailor-made for specific cancer applications. This review describes three peptide classes, targeting, cell penetrating, and fusogenic peptides, as stand-alone nanoparticle systems, conjugations to nanoparticle systems, or as the therapeutic modality. Peptide nanoparticle design, characteristics, and applications are discussed as well as peptide applications in the clinical space.

Indexed as

CancerDrug therapyGene therapyNanoparticle conjugationPeptide delivery

Identifiers

PMID35434595
PMCPMC9010702
OpenAlexW4220905650

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.