Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35435921›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Machine Learning Prediction of Non-Coding Variant Impact in Human Retinal cis-Regulatory Elements.

Leah S VandenBosch, Kelsey Luu, Andrew E Timms, Shriya Challam, Yue Wu, Aaron Y Lee, Timothy J Cherry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leah S VandenBoschCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kelsey LuuCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew E TimmsCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Shriya ChallamCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yue WuUniversity of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aaron Y LeeUniversity of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, Seattle, WA, USA.
Timothy J CherryCenter for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Seattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Non-Coding Genetic Vulnerabilities in Human Photoreceptor Function and DiseaseR01EY028584 · NEI · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHERRY, TIMOTHY JOEL · 2019 to 2025
$4.2M
Optimizing Models of Non-Coding Genetic Risk in Age-Related Macular DegenerationR01EY033364 · NEI · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI TIMOTHY JOEL CHERRY · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028584NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Prior studies have demonstrated the significance of specific cis-regulatory variants in retinal disease; however, determining the functional impact of regulatory variants remains a major challenge. In this study, we utilized a machine learning approach, trained on epigenomic data from the adult human retina, to systematically quantify the predicted impact of cis-regulatory variants. Methods: We used human retinal DNA accessibility data (ATAC-seq) to determine a set of 18.9k high-confidence, putative cis-regulatory elements. Eighty percent of these elements were used to train a machine learning model utilizing a gapped k-mer support vector machine-based approach. In silico saturation mutagenesis and variant scoring was applied to predict the functional impact of all potential single nucleotide variants within cis-regulatory elements. Impact scores were tested in a 20% hold-out dataset and compared to allele population frequency, phylogenetic conservation, transcription factor (TF) binding motifs, and existing massively parallel reporter assay data. Results: We generated a model that distinguishes between human retinal regulatory elements and negative test sequences with 95% accuracy. Among a hold-out test set of 3.7k human retinal CREs, all possible single nucleotide variants were scored. Variants with negative impact scores correlated with higher phylogenetic conservation of the reference allele, disruption of predicted TF binding motifs, and massively parallel reporter expression. Conclusions: We demonstrated the utility of human retinal epigenomic data to train a machine learning model for the purpose of predicting the impact of non-coding regulatory sequence variants. Our model accurately scored sequences and predicted putative transcription factor binding motifs. This approach has the potential to expedite the characterization of pathogenic non-coding sequence variants in the context of unexplained retinal disease. Translational Relevance: This workflow and resulting dataset serve as a promising genomic tool to facilitate the clinical prioritization of functionally disruptive non-coding mutations in the retina.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRetinal DiseasesHumansNucleotidesPhylogenyRetinaTranscription FactorsNucleotidesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID35435921
PMCPMC9034719
OpenAlexW4226139222

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.