ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Machine Learning Prediction of Non-Coding Variant Impact in Human Retinal cis-Regulatory Elements.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding cell-class specific roles of non-coding variants in human retina.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neur-Ally: a deep learning model for regulatory variant prediction based on genomic and epigenomic features in brain and its validation in certain neurological disorders.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Prediction of Non-Coding Variant Impact in Cell-Class-Specific Human RetinalbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Active learning of enhancers and silencers in the developing neural retina.Cell systems · 2025Article
- Integrative identification of non-coding regulatory regions driving metastatic prostate cancer.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Decoding Non-coding Variants: Recent Approaches to Studying Their Role in Gene Regulation and Human Diseases.Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition) · 2024Review
- Prioritizing cardiovascular disease-associated variants altering NKX2-5 and TBX5 binding through an integrative computational approach.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2023Article
- Active learning of enhancer and silencer regulatory grammar in photoreceptors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Characterization of sequence determinants of enhancer function using natural genetic variation.eLife · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Prior studies have demonstrated the significance of specific cis-regulatory variants in retinal disease; however, determining the functional impact of regulatory variants remains a major challenge. In this study, we utilized a machine learning approach, trained on epigenomic data from the adult human retina, to systematically quantify the predicted impact of cis-regulatory variants. Methods: We used human retinal DNA accessibility data (ATAC-seq) to determine a set of 18.9k high-confidence, putative cis-regulatory elements. Eighty percent of these elements were used to train a machine learning model utilizing a gapped k-mer support vector machine-based approach. In silico saturation mutagenesis and variant scoring was applied to predict the functional impact of all potential single nucleotide variants within cis-regulatory elements. Impact scores were tested in a 20% hold-out dataset and compared to allele population frequency, phylogenetic conservation, transcription factor (TF) binding motifs, and existing massively parallel reporter assay data. Results: We generated a model that distinguishes between human retinal regulatory elements and negative test sequences with 95% accuracy. Among a hold-out test set of 3.7k human retinal CREs, all possible single nucleotide variants were scored. Variants with negative impact scores correlated with higher phylogenetic conservation of the reference allele, disruption of predicted TF binding motifs, and massively parallel reporter expression. Conclusions: We demonstrated the utility of human retinal epigenomic data to train a machine learning model for the purpose of predicting the impact of non-coding regulatory sequence variants. Our model accurately scored sequences and predicted putative transcription factor binding motifs. This approach has the potential to expedite the characterization of pathogenic non-coding sequence variants in the context of unexplained retinal disease. Translational Relevance: This workflow and resulting dataset serve as a promising genomic tool to facilitate the clinical prioritization of functionally disruptive non-coding mutations in the retina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.