Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35440469›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2022

Colchicine for COVID-19 in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial.

Jienchi Dorward, Ly-Mee Yu, Gail Hayward, Benjamin R Saville, Oghenekome Gbinigie, Oliver Van Hecke, Emma Ogburn, Philip H Evans, Nicholas Pb Thomas, Mahendra G Patel and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialAdaptive Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. COVID-19 drug discovery and treatment options.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jienchi DorwardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6072-1430
Ly-Mee YuNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0331-7364
Gail HaywardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0852-627X
Benjamin R SavilleBerry Consultants, Texas, TX, US; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee, TN, US.
Oghenekome GbinigieNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-4491
Oliver Van HeckeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-5057
Emma OgburnNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-572X
Philip H EvansCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network, NIHR, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5277-3545
Nicholas Pb ThomasNIHR, London; Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0460-6870
Mahendra G PatelNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-3542
Duncan RichardsOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8093-7084
Nicholas BerryBerry Consultants, Texas, TX, US.ORCID 0000-0001-8701-3258
Michelle A DetryBerry Consultants, Texas, TX, US.ORCID 0000-0002-2794-1439
Christina SaundersBerry Consultants, Texas, TX, US.ORCID 0000-0003-4325-9568
Mark FitzgeraldBerry Consultants, Texas, TX, US.ORCID 0000-0002-8912-1663
Victoria HarrisNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3345-2826
Milensu ShanyindeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4842-9247
Simon de LusignanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8553-2641
Monique I AnderssonNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0619-1074
Christopher C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0102-3453
Fd Richard HobbsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7976-7172
PRINCIPLE Trial Collaborative Group
University of Oxford · GBBerry & Associates (United States) · USRoyal College of General Practitioners · GBCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZANational Institute for Health Research · GBVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColchicine has been proposed as a COVID-19 treatment.

aimTo determine whether colchicine reduces time to recovery and COVID-19-related admissions to hospital and/or deaths among people in the community. DESIGN AND

settingProspective, multicentre, open-label, multi-arm, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial (PRINCIPLE).

methodAdults aged ≥65 years or ≥18 years with comorbidities or shortness of breath, and unwell for ≤14 days with suspected COVID-19 in the community, were randomised to usual care, usual care plus colchicine (500 µg daily for 14 days), or usual care plus other interventions. The co-primary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery and admission to hospital/death related to COVID-19, within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models.

resultsThe trial opened on 2 April 2020. Randomisation to colchicine started on 4 March 2021 and stopped on 26 May 2021 because the prespecified time to recovery futility criterion was met. The primary analysis model included 2755 participants who were SARS-CoV-2 positive, randomised to colchicine (

conclusionColchicine did not improve time to recovery in people at higher risk of complications with COVID-19 in the community.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdultBayes TheoremColchicineHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeColchicinecolchicinecommunityCOVID-19primary health carerandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID35440469
PMCPMC9037186
OpenAlexW4221020415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.