Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445090›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Quantitative Flow Ratio or Angiography for the Assessment of Non-culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Protocol of the Randomized Trial QUOMODO.

Helen Ullrich, Maximilian Olschewski, Khelifa-Anis Belhadj, Thomas Münzel, Tommaso Gori

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04808310 (QUantitative Flow Ratio Or Angiography for the assessMent of nOn-culprit Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04808310 phase4completednot on this map

QUantitative Flow Ratio Or Angiography for the assessMent of nOn-culprit Lesions

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohannes Gutenberg University MainzRan2020 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsQuantitative flow ratio, Assessment of angiographic severity of the stenosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantitative flow ratio or angiography for the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes, a randomized trial.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helen UllrichDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Maximilian OlschewskiDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Khelifa-Anis BelhadjDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas MünzelDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Tommaso GoriDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately 50% of the patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have additional stenotic lesions in non-infarct-related coronary arteries. The decision whether these stenoses require further treatment is routinely based on angiography alone. The quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a simple non-invasive method that may help quantify the functional significance of these intermediate coronary artery lesions. The aim of our single-center, randomized superiority trial is to test the impact and efficacy of QFR, as compared to angiography, in the treatment of patients with ACS with multivessel coronary artery disease. Primary goal of the study is to investigate 1. The impact of QFR on the proportion of patients receiving PCI vs. conservative therapy and 2. whether QFR improves angina pectoris and overall cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and Analysis: After treatment of the culprit lesion(s), a total of 200 consecutive ACS patients will be randomized 1:1 to angiography- vs. QFR-guided revascularization of non-culprit stenoses. Patients and clinicians responsible are blinded to the randomization group. The primary functional endpoint is defined as the proportion of patients assigned to medical treatment in the two groups. The primary clinical endpoint is a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization and significant angina at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in the SAQ subgroups, and clinical events at 3- and 12-month follow-up. Discussion: This study is designed to investigate whether QFR-based decision-making is associated with a decrease in angina and an improved prognosis in patients with multivessel disease. Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04808310).

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeangiographyfractional flow reservepercutaneous coronary interventionsquantitative flow ratio

Identifiers

PMID35445090
PMCPMC9013799
OpenAlexW4226071717

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.