Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445334›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2022

Contact chemoreception in multi-modal sensing of prey by Octopus.

K C Buresch, K Sklar, J Y Chen, S R Madden, A S Mongil, G V Wise, J G Boal, R T Hanlon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multiple longitudinal tracts in the cephalopod arm sensorimotor system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K C Buresch *Marine Biological Laboratory, 7 MBL St, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA. kburesch@mbl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0969-4008
K Sklar *Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4044-5795
J Y ChenNortheastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
S R MaddenNortheastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-4954
A S MongilNortheastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1090-046X
G V WiseNortheastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1067-2981
J G BoalMillersville University, PO Box 1002, Millersville, PA, 17551, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3964-1716
R T HanlonMarine Biological Laboratory, 7 MBL St, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0004-5674
Northeastern University · USMarine Biological Laboratory · USMillersville University · US

Funding

Office of Naval Research N00014-19-1-2495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Octopuses have keen vision and are generally considered visual predators, yet octopuses predominantly forage blindly in nature, inserting their arms into crevices to search and detect hidden prey. The extent to which octopuses discriminate prey using chemo- versus mechano-tactile sensing is unknown. We developed a whole-animal behavioral assay that takes advantage of octopuses' natural searching behavior to test their ability to discriminate prey from non-prey tastes solely via contact chemoreception. This methodology eliminated vision, mechano-tactile sensing and distance chemoreception while testing the contact chemosensory discriminatory abilities of the octopus arm suckers. Extracts from two types of prey (crab, shrimp) and three types of non-prey (sea star, algae, seawater) were embedded in agarose (to control for mechano-tactile discrimination) and presented to octopuses inside an artificial rock dome; octopuses reached their arms inside to explore its contents - imitating natural prey-searching behavior. Results revealed that octopuses are capable of discriminating between potential prey items using only contact chemoreception, as measured by an increased amount of sucker contact time and arm curls when presented with prey extracts versus non-prey extracts. These results highlight the importance of contact chemoreception in the multi-modal sensing involved in a complex foraging behavior.

Indexed as

BrachyuraOctopodiformesTouch PerceptionAnimalsTouchBehaviorForagingOctopus bimaculoidesSensory perceptionSuckers

Identifiers

PMID35445334
OpenAlexW4224223923

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.