ArticleJournal of imaging2022
Addressing Motion Blurs in Brain MRI Scans Using Conditional Adversarial Networks and Simulated Curvilinear Motions.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning for Brain MRI Artifact Correction: Current Challenges and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of AI-driven MRI Motion Artifact Detection and Correction.ArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In-scanner head motion often leads to degradation in MRI scans and is a major source of error in diagnosing brain abnormalities. Researchers have explored various approaches, including blind and nonblind deconvolutions, to correct the motion artifacts in MRI scans. Inspired by the recent success of deep learning models in medical image analysis, we investigate the efficacy of employing generative adversarial networks (GANs) to address motion blurs in brain MRI scans. We cast the problem as a blind deconvolution task where a neural network is trained to guess a blurring kernel that produced the observed corruption. Specifically, our study explores a new approach under the sparse coding paradigm where every ground truth corrupting kernel is assumed to be a "combination" of a relatively small universe of "basis" kernels. This assumption is based on the intuition that, on small distance scales, patients' moves follow simple curves and that complex motions can be obtained by combining a number of simple ones. We show that, with a suitably dense basis, a neural network can effectively guess the degrading kernel and reverse some of the damage in the motion-affected real-world scans. To this end, we generated 10,000 continuous and curvilinear kernels in random positions and directions that are likely to uniformly populate the space of corrupting kernels in real-world scans. We further generated a large dataset of 225,000 pairs of sharp and blurred MR images to facilitate training effective deep learning models. Our experimental results demonstrate the viability of the proposed approach evaluated using synthetic and real-world MRI scans. Our study further suggests there is merit in exploring separate models for the sagittal, axial, and coronal planes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.