Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449534›Full record

ArticleVascular health and risk management2022

Home Blood Pressure Measurement and Self-Interpretation of Blood Pressure Readings During Pregnancy: Hy-Result e-Health Prospective Study.

Nicolas Postel-Vinay, Jiali-Delphine Shao, Anne Pinton, Aude Servais, Nicole Gebara, Laurence Amar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas Postel-VinayHypertension Unit, ESH Excellence Center, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France.
Jiali-Delphine ShaoFaculté de médecine de l'Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Anne PintonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Trousseau Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7407-0683
Aude ServaisNephrology and Transplantation Department, Necker Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Nicole GebaraHypertension Unit, ESH Excellence Center, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France.
Laurence AmarHypertension Unit, ESH Excellence Center, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRFondation de France · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hy-Result is a rule management system designed to help patients to be compliant with the home blood pressure measurement (HBPM) monitoring schedule and to understand their BP readings. The aim of the Hy-Result e-Health prospective study is to evaluate the practice and experience of women using the Hy-Result coaching app for self-interpretation of BP readings during and after pregnancy. Methods: Participants were asked to: i) measure their BP at home; ii) use the Hy-Result app and send their PDF report to the researcher; iii) answer anonymously to 3 online independent questionnaires (Q). Results: A total of 107 women accepted to measure their BP and use the app. Among them 82 (77%) performed HBPM and used successfully the system and 72 (88%) shared to the investigator their PDF report by email. Of these, 95% declared the software was "easy" or "very easy" to use; 93% believe the software helps them to monitor their BP more effectively (74% agree, 18% somewhat agree); 94% that the color code classification was "clear"; 76 (93%) affirmed that the app helped them when consulting their physician for their BP evaluation. Majority (87%) perceived the software to be reliable. Furthermore, 71 (87%) said they trust the system and 51 (62%) declared that performing HBPM and self-interpret their readings was "reassuring" whereas 6 (7%) felt that it was "a concern". Conclusion: This study shows that the majority (88%) of pregnant women performed HBPM and successfully used the Hy-Result software for self-interpretation of the BP readings. The use of the validated Hy-Result system by pregnant women may thus be recommended in common practice by healthcare professionals and patient associations.

Indexed as

HypertensionTelemedicineBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleHumansMalePregnancyProspective Studiese-healthhealth informaticshome blood pressure monitoringhypertensionpregnancyself-monitoringtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35449534
PMCPMC9017708
OpenAlexW4224103870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.