Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449606›Full record

ReviewCardiology research and practice2022

Tailoring the Ablative Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Zefferino Palamà, Martina Nesti, Antonio Gianluca Robles, Antonio Scarà, Silvio Romano, Elena Cavarretta, Maria Penco, Pietro Delise, Mariano Rillo, Leonardo Calò and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Magnetic Ball Chain Robots for Cardiac Arrhythmia Treatment.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zefferino PalamàElectrophysiology Unit, Casa di Cura "Villa Verde", Via Golfo di Taranto, 22, Taranto, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9262-6654
Martina NestiCardiovascular and Neurological Department, Ospedale San Donato, Via Nenni, 20/22, Arezzo, Italy.
Antonio Gianluca RoblesDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2150-3788
Antonio ScaràCardiology Unit, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina, Rome 1049, Italy.
Silvio RomanoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Elena CavarrettaDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Latina, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-6000
Maria PencoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Pietro DeliseU.O. Cardiologia, Ospedale P. Pederzoli, Peschiera Del Garda (VR), Italy.
Mariano RilloElectrophysiology Unit, Casa di Cura "Villa Verde", Via Golfo di Taranto, 22, Taranto, Italy.
Leonardo CalòCardiology Unit, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina, Rome 1049, Italy.
Luigi SciarraDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9669-1330
University of L'Aquila · ITPoliclinico Casilino · ITCasa di Cura Villa Garda · ITClinica Mediterranea · ITOspedale San Donato · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of technological progress and the improving skills of operators, atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation results appear to date to be at a plateau. In any case, the superiority of ablation over pharmacological therapy in terms of effectiveness, reduction of hospitalizations, and improvement has been well demonstrated in recent randomized trials. Triggers, substrate, and modulating factors (elements of Coumel's triangle) play different roles in paroxysmal and persistent AF, so induction and perpetuation mechanisms of arrhythmia may be different in each patient. Although effective ablative strategies are available for the treatment of paroxysmal AF triggers and persistent AF substrates, an adequate clinical evaluation of the patient is crucial in order to increase the chances of success. Recognizing triggers allows not only performing an effective ablation but also to avoid unnecessary lesions and at the same time reducing the risk of complications. AF beginning and triggers could be recorded by 12-lead ECG, continuous Holter monitoring, or implantable devices. In case of an unsuccessful noninvasive evaluation, nonpulmonary vein triggers should be investigated with an electrophysiological study. Persistent AF needs more effort to perform an accurate substrate characterization. Among the many methods proposed, recently the use of high-density mapping and multipolar catheters seems of particular benefit in order to clarify the arrhythmia mechanisms. Surgical and hybrid techniques allow to treat regions such as the posterior wall or Bachmann's bundle, which is fundamental for an ablative strategy that goes beyond just pulmonary vein isolation. Too often, patients are referred to electrophysiology laboratories without adequate preprocedural screening and planning in order to submit them to a standard "ready-made" procedure. The accurate search for triggers in paroxysmal AF and the correct recognition of the link between a possible underlying heart disease and the substrate in persistent AF could allow us to tailor the interventional approach in order to overcome the current plateau, increasing ablative procedure success and minimizing complications.

Identifiers

PMID35449606
PMCPMC9017557
OpenAlexW4214633135

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.