Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35450189›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of ophthalmology2022

Transgenic dry eye mouse models: powerful tools to study dry eye disease.

Dan-Yi Qin, Li-Xiang Wang, Ying-Ping Deng

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Corneal injury repair and the potential involvement of ZEB1.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  3. Animal Models in Eye Research: Focus on Corneal Pathologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan-Yi QinDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Li-Xiang WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Ying-Ping DengDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is one of the most common chronic multifactorial ocular surface diseases with high prevalence and complex pathogenesis. DED results in several ocular discomforts, vision fluctuation, and even potential damage of the ocular surface, bringing heavy burdens both on individuals and the society. The pathology of DED consists of tear film hyperosmolarity and immune responses on the ocular surface. Mice are widely used for developing models that simulate human DED features for investigating its pathogenesis and treatment. DED can be classified into aqueous-deficiency dry eye (ADDE) and evaporative dry eye (EDE). ADDE can be further divided into Sjögren syndrome dry eye (SSDE) and non-Sjögren syndrome dry eye (NSSDE). SSDE mouse models include natural strains, typified by non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice, and genetically engineered ones, like

Indexed as

dry eye diseasemouse modelsocular surfacepathologytransgenic

Identifiers

PMID35450189
PMCPMC8995740
OpenAlexW4220876955

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.