Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451015›Full record

SynthesisHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2022

Association between an AMH promoter polymorphism and serum AMH levels in PCOS patients.

Loes M E Moolhuijsen, Yvonne V Louwers, Anke McLuskey, Linda Broer, Andre G Uitterlinden, Renée M G Verdiesen, Ryan K Sisk, Andrea Dunaif, Joop S E Laven, Jenny A Visser

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The most appropriate indicators of successful ovarian stimulation.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Loes M E MoolhuijsenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3012-4675
Yvonne V LouwersDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Anke McLuskeyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Linda BroerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Andre G UitterlindenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Renée M G VerdiesenDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2061-0530
Ryan K SiskDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrea DunaifDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Joop S E LavenDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jenny A VisserDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-3571
Erasmus MC · NLIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNorthwestern University · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDo polymorphisms in the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) promoter have an effect on AMH levels in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: We have identified a novel AMH promoter polymorphism rs10406324 that is associated with lower serum AMH levels and is suggested to play a role in the mechanism of regulation of AMH gene expression in women. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Follicle number is positively correlated with serum AMH levels, reflected by elevated AMH levels in women with PCOS. In addition, it is suggested that AMH production per follicle is higher in women with PCOS than in normo-ovulatory women, implying an altered regulation of AMH in PCOS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A discovery cohort of 655 PCOS women of Northern European ancestry and both an internal and external validation PCOS cohort (n = 458 and n = 321, respectively) were included in this study. Summary-level data of an AMH genome-wide association study meta-analysis including 7049 normo-ovulatory women was included as a control cohort. A genetic approach was taken through association analysis and in silico analysis of the associated variants in the AMH promoter. In vitro analysis was performed to investigate the functional mechanisms. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsAll common two-allelic single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the region Chr19:2 245 353-2 250 827 bp (Build 37) were selected for the analysis. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association between SNPs in the AMH promoter region and serum AMH levels. For the in silico analysis, the webtools 'HaploReg' v4.1 for ENCODE prediction weight matrices and 'atSNP' were used. In vitro analysis was performed using KK1 cells, a mouse granulosa cell line and COV434 cells, a human granulosa tumor cell line. Cells were transfected with the reference or the variant human AMH promoter reporter construct together with several transcription factors (TFs). Dual-Glo® Luciferase Assay was performed to measure the luciferase activity. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Polymorphism rs10406324 was significantly associated with serum AMH levels in all three PCOS cohorts. Carriers of the minor allele G had significantly lower log-transformed serum AMH levels compared to non-carriers (P = 8.58 × 10-8, P = 1.35 × 10-3 and P = 1.24 × 10-3, respectively). This result was validated in a subsequent meta-analysis (P = 3.24 × 10-12). Interestingly, rs10406324 was not associated with follicle count, nor with other clinical traits. Also, in normo-ovulatory women, the minor allele of this variant was associated with lower serum AMH levels (P = 1.04 × 10-5). These findings suggest that polymorphism rs10406324 plays a role in the regulation of AMH expression, irrespective of clinical background. In silico analysis suggested a decreased binding affinity of the TFs steroidogenenic factor 1, estrogen-related receptor alpha and glucocorticoid receptor to the minor allele G variant, however in vitro analysis did not show a difference in promoter activity between the A and G allele. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Functional analyses were performed in a mouse and a human granulosa cell line using an AMH promoter reporter construct. This may have limited assessment of the impact of the polymorphism on higher order chromatin structures. Human granulosa cells generated from induced pluripotent stem cells, combined with gene editing, may provide a method to elucidate the exact mechanism behind the decrease in serum AMH levels in carriers of the -210 G allele. We acknowledge that the lack of follicle number in the external validation and the control cohort is a limitation of the paper. Although we observed that the association between rs10406324 and AMH levels was independent of follicle number in our discovery and internal validation PCOS cohorts, we cannot fully rule out that the observed effects on serum AMH levels are, in part, caused by differences in follicle number. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThese results suggest that variations in serum AMH levels are not only caused by differences in follicle number but also by genetic factors. Therefore, the genetic context should be taken into consideration when assessing serum AMH levels in women. This may have clinical consequences when serum AMH levels are used as a marker for the polycystic ovarian morphology phenotype. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used. J.S.E.L. has received consultancy fees from the following companies: Ferring, Roche Diagnostics and Ansh Labs and has received travel reimbursement from Ferring. J.A.V. has received royalties from AMH assays, paid to the institute/lab with no personal financial gain. The other authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Anti-Mullerian HormonePolycystic Ovary SyndromeAnimalsFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMiceOvarian FolliclePromoter Regions, GeneticAnti-Mullerian HormoneAMHgeneticsovaryPCOSSNP

Identifiers

PMID35451015
PMCPMC9247424
OpenAlexW4225584243

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.