Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451777›Full record

SynthesisMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Genome-Enabled Prediction Methods Based on Machine Learning.

Edgar L Reinoso-Peláez, Daniel Gianola, Oscar González-Recio

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How Plants Tolerate Salt Stress.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Transposable element polymorphisms improve prediction of complex agronomic traits in rice.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edgar L Reinoso-PeláezInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria. Ctra. de La Coruña, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel GianolaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Oscar González-RecioInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria. Ctra. de La Coruña, Madrid, Spain. gonzalez.oscar@inia.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth of artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) methodology has been explosive in recent years. In this class of procedures, computers get knowledge from sets of experiences and provide forecasts or classification. In genome-wide based prediction (GWP), many ML studies have been carried out. This chapter provides a description of main semiparametric and nonparametric algorithms used in GWP in animals and plants. Thirty-four ML comparative studies conducted in the last decade were used to develop a meta-analysis through a Thurstonian model, to evaluate algorithms with the best predictive qualities. It was found that some kernel, Bayesian, and ensemble methods displayed greater robustness and predictive ability. However, the type of study and data distribution must be considered in order to choose the most appropriate model for a given problem.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremGenomeBayesian methodsComplex traitsEnsemble methodsGWPKernel methodsMachine learningMeta-analysisNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID35451777

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.