Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453145›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Transfer learning of clinical outcomes from preclinical molecular data, principles and perspectives.

Axel Kowald, Israel Barrantes, Steffen Möller, Daniel Palmer, Hugo Murua Escobar, Anne Schwerk, Georg Fuellen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial intelligence to investigate metabolomics data for precision medicine.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Axel KowaldInstitute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Israel BarrantesInstitute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Steffen MöllerInstitute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Daniel PalmerInstitute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Hugo Murua EscobarDepartment of Medicine, Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Anne SchwerkCENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, Rostock, Germany.
Georg FuellenInstitute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-9829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate transfer learning of clinical outcomes from one cellular context to another, between cell types, developmental stages, omics modalities or species, is considered tremendously useful. When transferring a prediction task from a source domain to a target domain, what counts is the high quality of the predictions in the target domain, requiring states or processes common to both the source and the target that can be learned by the predictor reflected by shared denominators. These may form a compendium of knowledge that is learned in the source to enable predictions in the target, usually with few, if any, labeled target training samples to learn from. Transductive transfer learning refers to the learning of the predictor in the source domain, transferring its outcome label calculations to the target domain, considering the same task. Inductive transfer learning considers cases where the target predictor is performing a different yet related task as compared with the source predictor. Often, there is also a need to first map the variables in the input/feature spaces and/or the variables in the output/outcome spaces. We here discuss and juxtapose various recently published transfer learning approaches, specifically designed (or at least adaptable) to predict clinical (human in vivo) outcomes based on preclinical (mostly animal-based) molecular data, towards finding the right tool for a given task, and paving the way for a comprehensive and systematic comparison of the suitability and accuracy of transfer learning of clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Machine Learningbiomarkersinductive transfer learningshared denominatorstransductive transfer learningtransfer learningunsupervised transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID35453145
PMCPMC9116218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.