Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453515›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

In Vitro Models of Bone Marrow Remodelling and Immune Dysfunction in Space: Present State and Future Directions.

Ryan Sarkar, Francesco Pampaloni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep space environment empowering drug design and development.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Translation from Microgravity Research to Earth Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Microgravity and Space Medicine 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan SarkarBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5757-0907
Francesco PampaloniBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4357-7320

Funding

European Space Agency CORA-GBF-2017-001German Aerospace Center 50WB2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spaceflight affects the body on every level. Reports on astronaut health identify bone marrow remodelling and dysfunction of the innate immune system as significant health risks of long-term habitation in space. Microgravity-induced alterations of the bone marrow induce physical changes to the bone marrow stem cell niche. Downstream effects on innate immunity are expected due to impaired hematopoiesis and myelopoiesis. To date, few studies have investigated these effects in real microgravity and the sparsely available literature often reports contrasting results. This emphasizes a need for the development of physiologically relevant in vitro models of the bone marrow stem cell niche, capable of delivering appropriate sample sizes for robust statistics. Here, we review recent findings on the impact of spaceflight conditions on innate immunity in in vitro and animal models and discusses the latest in vitro models of the bone marrow stem cell niche and their potential translatability to gravitational biology research.

Indexed as

3D cell culturebone marrow nichehematopoiesishematopoietic progenitor cellsinnate immunitymesenchymal stem cellsmicrogravitymyelopoiesis

Identifiers

PMID35453515
PMCPMC9031916

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.