Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35453723›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

How Do Drugs Affect the Skeleton? Implications for Forensic Anthropology.

Nicholas Márquez-Grant, Elisa Baldini, Victoria Jeynes, Lucie Biehler-Gomez, Layla Aoukhiyad, Nicholas V Passalacqua, Gaia Giordano, Domenico Di Candia, Cristina Cattaneo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. No Bones About It: Sex Is Binary.Archives of sexual behavior · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicholas Márquez-GrantCranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5812-6189
Elisa BaldiniCranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK.
Victoria JeynesUrgent Primary Care, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK.
Lucie Biehler-GomezDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6674-7850
Layla AoukhiyadPharmacist, Servei de Salut de les Illes Balears, 07003 Palma, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-551X
Nicholas V PassalacquaAnthropology and Sociology Department, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-3844
Gaia GiordanoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6081-0596
Domenico Di CandiaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1401-6815
Cristina CattaneoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.
University of Milan · ITCranfield University · GBCwm Taf University Health Board · GBServei de Salut de les Illes Balears · ESWestern Carolina University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic anthropologists rely on a number of parameters when analyzing human skeletal remains to assist in the identification of the deceased, predominantly age-at-death, sex, stature, ancestry or population affinity, and any unique identifying features. During the examination of human remains, it is important to be aware that the skeletal features considered when applying anthropological methods may be influenced and modified by a number of factors, and particular to this article, prescription drugs (including medical and non-medical use) and other commonly used drugs. In view of this, this paper aims to review the medical, clinical and pharmacological literature to enable an assessment of those drug groups that as side effects have the potential to have an adverse effect on the skeleton, and explore whether or not they can influence the estimation of age-at-death, sex and other indicators of the biological profile. Moreover, it may be that the observation of certain alterations or inconsistencies in the skeleton may relate to the use of drugs or medication, and this in turn may help narrow down the list of missing persons to which a set of human remains could belong. The information gathered from the clinical and medical literature has been extracted with a forensic anthropological perspective and provides an awareness on how several drugs, such as opioids, cocaine, corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alcohol, tobacco and others have notable effects on bone. Through different mechanisms, drugs can alter bone mineral density, causing osteopenia, osteoporosis, increase the risk of fractures, osteonecrosis, and oral changes. Not much has been written on the influence of drugs on the skeleton from the forensic anthropological practitioner perspective; and this review, in spite of its limitations and the requirement of further research, aims to investigate the current knowledge of the possible effects of both prescription and recreational drugs on bones, contributing to providing a better awareness in forensic anthropological practice and assisting in the identification process of the deceased.

Indexed as

biological profiledrugs of abuseforensic anthropologyhuman identificationmedication

Identifiers

PMID35453723
PMCPMC9030599
OpenAlexW4221080106

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.