ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Implications of Myocardial Bridge on Coronary Atherosclerosis and Survival.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic impact of myocardial bridge on long-term mortality and morbidity: A meta-analysis and systematic review.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Unveiling the Masquerading of Myocardial Bridging in Cardiovascular Diseases.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical outcomes of FFR and IVUS-guided PCI in patients with myocardial bridging and proximal LAD stenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of myocardial bridge on lesion morphology and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI for LAD CTO.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The Unique Challenge of Coronary Artery Disease in Adult Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Concurrent Myocardial Bridging and Coronary Artery Disease: A Study of an Iranian Population.The journal of Tehran Heart Center · 2024Article
- Myocardial Bridge: Friend, Enemy, or Frenemy?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Editorial for Special Issue "Advance in Diagnostic and Management of Ischemic Heart Disease".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diagnostic value of myocardial bridge-mural coronary artery vascular morphology based on CTA technique.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study, we aimed to describe the impact of MBs on atherosclerosis and survival, in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: We retrospectively studied 1920 consecutive patients who underwent conventional coronary angiography for suspected CAD. Atherosclerotic load (AL), defined as the sum of degrees of stenosis, and general atherosclerotic load (GAL), representing the sum of AL, were compared between patients with MB and a control group without MB; patients in these groups were similar in age and sex. We assessed survival at 10 years after the last enrolled patient. Results: Prevalence of MB was 3.96%, predominantly in the mid-segment of left anterior descendent artery (LAD). In the presence of MB, GAL was lower (158.1 ± 93.7 vs. 205.3 ± 117.9, p = 0.004) with a lesser AL in the proximal (30.3 ± 39.9 vs. 42.9 ± 41.1, p = 0.038) and mid-segments (8.1 ± 20.0 vs. 25.3 ± 35.9, p < 0.001) of LAD. Based on a Multinominal Logistic Regression, we found that the presence of MB on LAD (regardless of its location on this artery) is a protective factor against atherosclerotic lesions, decreasing the probability of significant stenosis, especially of those ≥70%, on the entire artery (B −1.539, OR 4660; 95% CI = 1.873−11.595, p = 0.001) and on each of its segments as well: proximal LAD (B −1.275, OR 0.280; 95% CI = 0.015−5.073; p = 0.038), mid-LAD (B −1.879, OR 6.545; 95% CI = 1.492−28.712; p = 0.013) and distal LAD (B −0.900, OR 2.459, 95% CI = 2.459−2.459, p = 0.032). However, 10-year survival was similar between groups (76.70% vs. 74.30%, p = 0.740). Conclusion: The presence of MB on LAD proved to be a protective factor against atherosclerosis for the entire artery and for each of its segments, but it does not influence long-term survival in patients with CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.