Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35455356›Full record

ReviewVaccines2022

Immunosenescence and Altered Vaccine Efficiency in Older Subjects: A Myth Difficult to Change.

Tamas Fulop, Anis Larbi, Graham Pawelec, Alan A Cohen, Guillaume Provost, Abedelouahed Khalil, Guy Lacombe, Serafim Rodrigues, Mathieu Desroches, Katsuiku Hirokawa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Immunotherapies: A Treasure Trove of Alzheimer's Disease.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Reliable Hallmarks and Biomarkers of Senescent Lymphocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 9 countries.

Tamas FulopResearch Center on Aging, Geriatric Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada.
Anis LarbiSingapore Immunology Network (SIgN), Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Immunos Building, Singapore 138648, Singapore.
Graham PawelecDepartment of Immunology, University of Tübingen, 72072 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3600-0163
Alan A CohenGroupe de Recherche PRIMUS, Department of Family Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, 3001 12e Ave N, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada.
Guillaume ProvostIkerbasque, The Basque Foundation for Science, 48009 Bilbao, Spain.
Abedelouahed KhalilResearch Center on Aging, Geriatric Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0817-3160
Guy LacombeResearch Center on Aging, Geriatric Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada.
Serafim RodriguesIkerbasque, The Basque Foundation for Science, 48009 Bilbao, Spain.
Mathieu DesrochesMathNeuro Team, Inria Sophia Antipolis Méditerranée, CEDEX, 06902 Sophia Antipolis, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-4207
Katsuiku HirokawaInstitute of Health and Life Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Claudio FranceschiIRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Jacek M WitkowskiDepartment of Pathophysiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.
Université de Sherbrooke · CAIkerbasque · ESAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGGdańsk Medical University · PLHealth Sciences North · CAInstitute of Neurological Sciences · ITTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversité Côte d'Azur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organismal ageing is associated with many physiological changes, including differences in the immune system of most animals. These differences are often considered to be a key cause of age-associated diseases as well as decreased vaccine responses in humans. The most often cited vaccine failure is seasonal influenza, but, while it is usually the case that the efficiency of this vaccine is lower in older than younger adults, this is not always true, and the reasons for the differential responses are manifold. Undoubtedly, changes in the innate and adaptive immune response with ageing are associated with failure to respond to the influenza vaccine, but the cause is unclear. Moreover, recent advances in vaccine formulations and adjuvants, as well as in our understanding of immune changes with ageing, have contributed to the development of vaccines, such as those against herpes zoster and SARS-CoV-2, that can protect against serious disease in older adults just as well as in younger people. In the present article, we discuss the reasons why it is a myth that vaccines inevitably protect less well in older individuals, and that vaccines represent one of the most powerful means to protect the health and ensure the quality of life of older adults.

Indexed as

adaptive complex systemsCOVID-19 vaccineherpes–zoster vaccineimmunobiographyimmunosenescenceinflammaginginfluenza vaccinemathematical modelpneumococcal vaccinetipping pointtrained immunityvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35455356
PMCPMC9030923
OpenAlexW4223923513

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.