Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456269›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Perception of the Regulatory Change for Zolpidem Prescription by French General Practitioners and Its Relation to Prescription Behavior.

Edouard-Jules Laforgue, Marion Istvan, Benoit Schreck, Marie Mainguy, Pascale Jolliet, Marie Grall-Bronnec, Caroline Victorri-Vigneau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edouard-Jules LaforgueNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Évaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7400-1212
Marion IstvanNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Évaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Benoit SchreckNantes Université, Univ Tours, CHU Nantes, CHU Tours, INSERM, MethodS in Patients-Centered Outcomes and HEalth Research, SPHERE, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6141-9986
Marie MainguyNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Évaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Pascale JollietNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Évaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Marie Grall-BronnecNantes Université, Univ Tours, CHU Nantes, CHU Tours, INSERM, MethodS in Patients-Centered Outcomes and HEalth Research, SPHERE, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0722-7243
Caroline Victorri-VigneauNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique-Centre d'Évaluation et d'Information sur la Pharmacovigilance-Addictovigilance, F-44000 Nantes, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé AAP-2017-027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To “limit the risk of abuse and misuse” and “encourage correct usage”, the French drug regulatory authority stated that—from April 2017—zolpidem prescription must be performed on a secured prescription pad. This national study aims to evaluate the perception of general practitioners (GPs) towards this new regulation and its link with prescription strategies. Methods: We conducted structured interviews of GPs. Data were collected about GPs’ perception of the measure and therapeutic strategies towards zolpidem. The primary outcome was the description of the GPs’ strategy of prescription, based on the perception towards the new regulation for zolpidem. Results: For 206 GPs, the new regulation was mainly perceived as helpful (61%) and as a difficulty (55%). Other perceptions were the awareness of the risks of zolpidem (18%), awareness of the risks of hypnotics (13%), and nothing changed (5%). Four clusters of GPs were identified. In the clusters with the perception as a difficulty (only or associated with helpful), the GPs who applied the strategy “no modification” for >50% of their patients were more frequently compared to awareness and helpful only clusters (60.8%; 42.9%; 20.4%; 26.7%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We highlighted an association between the perception of the new regulation of zolpidem prescription by GPs and a strategy of prescription.

Indexed as

drug regulationgeneral practitionerperceptionprescription behaviorzolpidem

Identifiers

PMID35456269
PMCPMC9032177

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.