Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456357›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence-An Updated Overview.

Ștefan Busnatu, Adelina-Gabriela Niculescu, Alexandra Bolocan, George E D Petrescu, Dan Nicolae Păduraru, Iulian Năstasă, Mircea Lupușoru, Marius Geantă, Octavian Andronic, Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence in pediatric pain: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Early risk stratification for carbapenem resistance amongFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ștefan Busnatu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-9655
Adelina-Gabriela NiculescuDepartment of Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-504X
Alexandra Bolocan"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
George E D Petrescu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2651-3608
Dan Nicolae Păduraru"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Iulian Năstasă"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Mircea Lupușoru"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7344-9947
Marius GeantăCentre for Innovation in Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1510-8885
Octavian Andronic"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9053-0018
Alexandru Mihai GrumezescuDepartment of Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, Politehnica University of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-094X
Henrique MartinsFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilha, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7535-5103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize modern society in all its aspects. Encouraged by the variety and vast amount of data that can be gathered from patients (e.g., medical images, text, and electronic health records), researchers have recently increased their interest in developing AI solutions for clinical care. Moreover, a diverse repertoire of methods can be chosen towards creating performant models for use in medical applications, ranging from disease prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis to opting for the most appropriate treatment for an individual patient. In this respect, the present paper aims to review the advancements reported at the convergence of AI and clinical care. Thus, this work presents AI clinical applications in a comprehensive manner, discussing the recent literature studies classified according to medical specialties. In addition, the challenges and limitations hindering AI integration in the clinical setting are further pointed out.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical applicationsdeep learningmachine learningpersonalized medicineprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID35456357
PMCPMC9031863

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.