Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35456447›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Comparative Analysis of Transposable Elements and the Identification of Candidate Centromeric Elements in the

Lei Wang, Yan Wang, Jing Zhang, Yan Feng, Qing Chen, Zhen-Shan Liu, Cong-Li Liu, Wen He, Hao Wang, Shao-Feng Yang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Accurate Chromosome Identification in the Prunus SubgenusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lei WangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Yan WangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Jing ZhangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Yan FengCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Qing ChenCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Zhen-Shan LiuCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Cong-Li LiuZhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 410100, China.
Wen HeCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Hao WangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Shao-Feng YangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Yong ZhangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2281-4481
Ya LuoCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Hao-Ru TangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6008-2747
Xiao-Rong WangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-9571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The subgenus Cerasus and its relatives include many crucial economic drupe fruits and ornamental plants. Repetitive elements make up a large part of complex genomes, and some of them play an important role in gene regulation that can affect phenotypic variation. However, the variation in their genomes remains poorly understood. This work conducted a comprehensive repetitive sequence identification across the draft genomes of eight taxa of the genus Prunus, including four of the Prunus subgenus Cerasus (Prunus pseudocerasus, P. avium, P. yedoensis and P. × yedoensis) as well as congeneric species (Prunus salicina, P. armeniaca, P. dulcis and P. persica). Annotation results showed high proportions of transposable elements in their genomes, ranging from 52.28% (P. armeniaca) to 61.86% (P. pseudocerasus). The most notable differences in the contents of long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) and tandem repeats (TRs) were confirmed with de novo identification based on the structure of each genome, which significantly contributed to their genome size variation, especially in P. avium and P.salicina. Sequence comparisons showed many similar LTR-RTs closely related to their phylogenetic relationships, and a highly similar monomer unit of the TR sequence was conserved among species. Additionally, the predicted centromere-associated sequence was located in centromeric regions with FISH in the 12 taxa of Prunus. It presented significantly different signal intensities, even within the diverse interindividual phenotypes for Prunus tomentosa. This study provides insight into the LTR-RT and TR variation within Prunus and increases our knowledge about its role in genome evolution.

Indexed as

PrunusPrunus aviumCentromereDNA Transposable ElementsGenome, PlantPhylogenyRetroelementsDNA Transposable ElementsRetroelementscentromere-associated repetitive sequencelong terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-RTs)Oligo-FISHPrunus (Cerasus)tandem repeats (TR)

Identifiers

PMID35456447
PMCPMC9028240

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.