ReviewPolymers2022
Can 3D-Printed Bioactive Glasses Be the Future of Bone Tissue Engineering?
Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Printing of Biopolymer-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Materials, Fabrication, and Translational Strategies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating Additive and Traditional Manufacturing for Multiscale Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Article
- Microcrystallization Effects in Borosilicate Bioactive Glasses: Controllable Release of Bioactive Elements and In Vitro Degradation Properties.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Musculoskeletal Biomaterials: Stimulated and Synergized with Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Advanced Bioactive Glasses: The Newest Achievements and Breakthroughs in the Area.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Use of 3D Technology in the Management of Residual Asymmetry following Orthognathic Surgery: A Case Report.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Polymer/Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine: A Review.Polymers · 2023Review
- Recent Advancements in Electrospun Chitin and Chitosan Nanofibers for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Additive manufacturing of sustainable biomaterials for biomedical applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Review
- A Review on Manufacturing Processes of Biocomposites Based on Poly(α-Esters) and Bioactive Glass Fillers for Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Gelatin and Bioactive Glass Composites for Tissue Engineering: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- 3D-Printing for Critical Sized Bone Defects: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Clinical Applications of Poly-Methyl-Methacrylate in Neurosurgery: The In Vivo Cranial Bone Reconstruction.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Design Strategies and Biomimetic Approaches for Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study, cases of bone fracture or injury have increased to 33.4% in the past two decades. Bone-related injuries affect both physical and mental health and increase the morbidity rate. Biopolymers, metals, ceramics, and various biomaterials have been used to synthesize bone implants. Among these, bioactive glasses are one of the most biomimetic materials for human bones. They provide good mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and osteointegrative properties. Owing to these properties, various composites of bioactive glasses have been FDA-approved for diverse bone-related and other applications. However, bone defects and bone injuries require customized designs and replacements. Thus, the three-dimensional (3D) printing of bioactive glass composites has the potential to provide customized bone implants. This review highlights the bottlenecks in 3D printing bioactive glass and provides an overview of different types of 3D printing methods for bioactive glass. Furthermore, this review discusses synthetic and natural bioactive glass composites. This review aims to provide information on bioactive glass biomaterials and their potential in bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.