Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35458392›Full record

ReviewViruses2022

A Review of Viruses Infecting Yam (

Guo-Fu Luo, Ana Podolyan, Dawit B Kidanemariam, Carmel Pilotti, Gary Houliston, Amit C Sukal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Viruses of Yams (Viruses · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guo-Fu LuoCentre for Pacific Crops and Trees (CePaCT), Land Resources Division, Pacific Community (SPC), Suva, Fiji.
Ana PodolyanManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.
Dawit B KidanemariamDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Carmel PilottiCentre for Pacific Crops and Trees (CePaCT), Land Resources Division, Pacific Community (SPC), Suva, Fiji.
Gary HoulistonManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.
Amit C SukalCentre for Pacific Crops and Trees (CePaCT), Land Resources Division, Pacific Community (SPC), Suva, Fiji.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-2331

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yam is an important food staple for millions of people globally, particularly those in the developing countries of West Africa and the Pacific Islands. To sustain the growing population, yam production must be increased amidst the many biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant viruses are among the most detrimental of plant pathogens and have caused great losses of crop yield and quality, including those of yam. Knowledge and understanding of virus biology and ecology are important for the development of diagnostic tools and disease management strategies to combat the spread of yam-infecting viruses. This review aims to highlight current knowledge on key yam-infecting viruses by examining their characteristics, genetic diversity, disease symptoms, diagnostics, and elimination to provide a synopsis for consideration in developing diagnostic strategy and disease management for yam.

Indexed as

BadnavirusDioscoreaPlant VirusesAfrica, WesternHumansPacific IslandsbadnavirusDioscorea spp.macluraviruspotyvirusyam mild mosaic virusyam mosaic virusyam viruses

Identifiers

PMID35458392
PMCPMC9033002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.