Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35459694›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2022

Frailty assessment for COVID-19 follow-up: a prospective cohort study.

Ilena Müller, Marco Mancinetti, Anja Renner, Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux, Martin H Brutsche, Christian Clarenbach, Christian Garzoni, Alexandra Lenoir, Bruno Naccini, Sebastian Ott and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frailty after COVID-19: The wave after?Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Long COVID and hypertension-related disorders: a report from the Japanese Society of Hypertension Project Team on COVID-19.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
  11. COVID-19 Sequelae and Their Implications on Social Services.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Ilena MüllerDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marco MancinettiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hopital cantonal de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Anja RennerDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Pierre-Olivier BridevauxService de Pneumologie, Hopital du Valais, Sion, Switzerland.
Martin H BrutscheLung Center, Kantonsspital St Gallen, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland.
Christian ClarenbachDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian GarzoniClinic of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland.
Alexandra LenoirDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bruno NacciniDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland.
Sebastian OttDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lise PiquilloudAdult Intensive Care Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4226-8772
Maura PrellaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yok-Ai QueDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Paola Marina SoccalDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneve, Switzerland.
Christophe von GarnierDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas K GeiserDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Manuela Funke-ChambourDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sabina GulerDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland Sabina.Guler@insel.ch.
University Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Bern · CHClinica Luganese Moncucco · CHFribourg Development Agency · CHHôpital du Valais · CHKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is increasingly used for clinical decision making in acute care but little is known about frailty after COVID-19.

objectivesTo investigate frailty and the CFS for post-COVID-19 follow-up.

methodsThis prospective multicentre cohort study included COVID-19 survivors aged ≥50 years presenting for a follow-up visit ≥3 months after the acute illness. Nine centres retrospectively collected pre-COVID-19 CFS and prospectively CFS at follow-up. Three centres completed the Frailty Index (FI), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), 30 s sit-to-stand test and handgrip strength measurements. Mixed effect logistic regression models accounting for repeated measurements and potential confounders were used to investigate factors associated with post-COVID-19 CFS. Criterion and construct validity were determined by correlating the CFS to other concurrently assessed frailty measurements and measures of respiratory impairment, respectively.

resultsOf the 288 participants 65% were men, mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9) years. Median (IQR) CFS at follow-up was 3 (2-3), 21% were vulnerable or frail (CFS ≥4). The CFS was responsive to change, correlated with the FI (r=0.69, p<0.001), the SPPB score (r=-0.48, p<0.001) (criterion validity) and with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (r=0.59, p<0.001), forced vital capacity %-predicted (r=-0.25, p<0.001), 6 min walk distance (r=-0.39, p<0.001) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) (r=0.59, p<0.001). Dyspnoea was significantly associated with a higher odds for vulnerability/frailty (per one mMRC adjusted OR 2.01 (95% CI 1.13 to 3.58), p=0.02).

conclusionsThe CFS significantly increases with COVID-19, and dyspnoea is an important risk factor for post-COVID-19 frailty and should be addressed thoroughly.

Indexed as

COVID-19FrailtyCohort StudiesDyspneaFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19respiratory infection

Identifiers

PMID35459694
PMCPMC9035838
OpenAlexW4224325396

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.