Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460348›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

Guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric head and neck pathologies: a multicentre international consensus paper.

Felice D'Arco, Livja Mertiri, Pim de Graaf, Bert De Foer, Katarina S Popovič, Maria I Argyropoulou, Kshitij Mankad, Hervé J Brisse, Amy Juliano, Mariasavina Severino and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Cancer predisposition syndromes: an imaging review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. [The critical thoughts on diagnosis and treatment of childhood hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Felice D'Arco *Radiology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Livja Mertiri *Radiology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK. livja.mertiri16@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0199-808X
Pim de GraafDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bert De FoerRadiology Department, GZA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium.
Katarina S PopovičNeuroradiology Department, Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maria I ArgyropoulouDepartment of Clinical Radiology and Imaging, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Kshitij MankadRadiology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Hervé J BrisseImaging Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Amy JulianoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mariasavina SeverinoNeuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Sofie Van CauterDepartment of Medical Imaging, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Mai-Lan HoNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Caroline D RobsonDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ata SiddiquiRadiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Steve ConnorRadiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sotirios BisdasLysholm Department of Neuroradiology, The National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Consensus for Magnetic Resonance Protocols Study (COMPS) Group

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R002118/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of standardized imaging protocols is paramount in order to facilitate comparable, reproducible images and, consequently, to optimize patient care. Standardized MR protocols are lacking when studying head and neck pathologies in the pediatric population. We propose an international, multicenter consensus paper focused on providing the best combination of acquisition time/technical requirements and image quality. Distinct protocols for different regions of the head and neck and, in some cases, for specific pathologies or clinical indications are recommended. This white paper is endorsed by several international scientific societies and it is the result of discussion, in consensus, among experts in pediatric head and neck imaging.

Indexed as

HeadHead and Neck NeoplasmsChildConsensusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeckGuidelinesHead and neck imagesMagnetic resonance imagingPediatric neuroradiologyStandardized protocols

Identifiers

PMID35460348

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.