Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462662›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of surgical oncology2022

Remote Access Thyroid Surgery: A Review of Literature.

Akshay Kudpaje, Anand Subash, Narayana Subramaniam, Carsten E Palme, Vishal Rao Us, Gururaj Arakeri

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A prospective study to assess cervical scar satisfaction following conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Progress in gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Akshay KudpajeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, HCG Cancer Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka India.ORCID 0000-0002-6987-9303
Anand SubashDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, HCG Cancer Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka India.
Narayana SubramaniamDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Narayana Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka India.
Carsten E PalmeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, The Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia.
Vishal Rao UsDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, HCG Cancer Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka India.
Gururaj ArakeriDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, HCG Cancer Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka India.
HCG Cancer Centre · INChris O’Brien Lifehouse · AUNarayana Health · INNavodaya Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first description of endoscopic thyroid lobectomy in 1997, a variety of techniques have been developed to avoid the visible cervical scar conventionally been associated with thyroidectomy. These "remote access" approaches, which typically use either endoscopic or robotic instrumentation, have successfully avoided the anterior neck scar, which has a measurable impact on the patient's quality of life (Graves and Suh Surgery 168(5):845-850, 2020; Sakorafas World J Surg 34(8):1793-1804, 2010). The main advantage of these techniques is better cosmesis compared to conventional transcervical approaches (Graves and Suh Surgery 168(5):845-850, 2020) However, these techniques have failed to gain widespread acceptance in the surgical community because of the technical challenges, scepticism about oncological safety and cost factors. This review presents an overview of the various methods of remote access thyroid surgery (RATS) and also evaluates the selection criteria, oncological efficacy, training requirements and key advantages of this technique.

Indexed as

Endoscopic thyroidectomyMinimal access surgeryRemote access surgeryRobotic surgeryThyroid cancerThyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID35462662
PMCPMC8986942
OpenAlexW3170750169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.