ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2022
LINA: A Linearizing Neural Network Architecture for Accurate First-Order and Second-Order Interpretations.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of nested cross-validation, automated hyperparameter optimization, high-performance computing to reduce and quantify the variance of test performance estimation of deep learning models.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Benchmarking interpretability of deep learning for predictive genomics: Recall, precision, and variability of feature attribution.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Automatic renal carcinoma biopsy guidance using forward-viewing endoscopic optical coherence tomography and deep learning.Communications engineering · 2024Article
- Designing interpretable deep learning applications for functional genomics: a quantitative analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Enhancing epidural needle guidance using a polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography probe with convolutional neural networks.Journal of biophotonics · 2024Article
- Automatic renal carcinoma biopsy guidance using forward-viewing endoscopic optical coherence tomography and deep learning.Research square · 2023Article
- Explainable multi-task learning improves the parallel estimation of polygenic risk scores for many diseases through shared genetic basis.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- MetaLP: An integrative linear programming method for protein inference in metaproteomics.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Epidural anesthesia needle guidance by forward-view endoscopic optical coherence tomography and deep learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While neural networks can provide high predictive performance, it was a challenge to identify the salient features and important feature interactions used for their predictions. This represented a key hurdle for deploying neural networks in many biomedical applications that require interpretability, including predictive genomics. In this paper, linearizing neural network architecture (LINA) was developed here to provide both the first-order and the second-order interpretations on both the instance-wise and the model-wise levels. LINA combines the representational capacity of a deep inner attention neural network with a linearized intermediate representation for model interpretation. In comparison with DeepLIFT, LIME, Grad*Input and L2X, the first-order interpretation of LINA had better Spearman correlation with the ground-truth importance rankings of features in synthetic datasets. In comparison with NID and GEH, the second-order interpretation results from LINA achieved better precision for identification of the ground-truth feature interactions in synthetic datasets. These algorithms were further benchmarked using predictive genomics as a real-world application. LINA identified larger numbers of important single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and salient SNP interactions than the other algorithms at given false discovery rates. The results showed accurate and versatile model interpretation using LINA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.