Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463339›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pathological Upgrade From Combined Transperineal Systematic and MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy to Final Pathology: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Junlong Zhuang, Yansheng Kan, Yuwen Wang, Alessandro Marquis, Xuefeng Qiu, Marco Oderda, Haifeng Huang, Marco Gatti, Fan Zhang, Paolo Gontero and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Junlong ZhuangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yansheng KanDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yuwen WangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Alessandro MarquisDepartment of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Xuefeng QiuDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Marco OderdaDepartment of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Haifeng HuangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Marco GattiDepartment of Radiology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Paolo GonteroDepartment of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Linfeng XuDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Giorgio CallerisDepartment of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Yao FuDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Bing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Giancarlo MarraDepartment of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Hongqian GuoDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing University · CNUniversity of Turin · ITNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNPredict (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the pathological concordance from combined systematic and MRI-targeted prostate biopsy to final pathology and to verify the effectiveness of a machine learning-based model with targeted biopsy (TB) features in predicting pathological upgrade. Materials and Methods: All patients in this study underwent prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), transperineal systematic plus transperineal targeted prostate biopsy under local anesthesia, and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) sequentially from October 2016 to February 2020 in two referral centers. For cores with cancer, grade group (GG) and Gleason score were determined by using the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) guidelines. Four supervised machine learning methods were employed, including two base classifiers and two ensemble learning-based classifiers. In all classifiers, the training set was 395 of 565 (70%) patients, and the test set was the remaining 170 patients. The prediction performance of each model was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The Gini index was used to evaluate the importance of all features and to figure out the most contributed features. A nomogram was established to visually predict the risk of upgrading. Predicted probability was a prevalence rate calculated by a proposed nomogram. Results: A total of 515 patients were included in our cohort. The combined biopsy had a better concordance of postoperative histopathology than a systematic biopsy (SB) only (48.15% vs. 40.19%, Conclusion: The combined effect of SB plus TB led to a better pathological concordance rate and less upgrading from biopsy to RP. Machine learning models with features of TB to predict PCa GG upgrading have a satisfactory predictive efficacy.

Indexed as

biopsymachine learningpredictionprostate cancerprostatectomyupgrade

Identifiers

PMID35463339
PMCPMC9021959
OpenAlexW4225592407

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.