Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35465161›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

Machine learning assisted analysis of breast cancer gene expression profiles reveals novel potential prognostic biomarkers for triple-negative breast cancer.

Anamika Thalor, Hemant Kumar Joon, Gagandeep Singh, Shikha Roy, Dinesh Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anamika ThalorTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Hemant Kumar JoonTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Gagandeep SinghTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Shikha RoyTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Dinesh GuptaTranslational Bioinformatics Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity and the unclear metastasis mechanisms are the leading cause for the unavailability of effective targeted therapy for Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a breast cancer (BrCa) subtype characterized by high mortality and high frequency of distant metastasis cases. The identification of prognostic biomarker can improve prognosis and personalized treatment regimes. Herein, we collected gene expression datasets representing TNBC and Non-TNBC BrCa. From the complete dataset, a subset reflecting solely known cancer driver genes was also constructed. Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) was employed to identify top 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 gene signatures that differentiate TNBC from the other BrCa subtypes. Five machine learning algorithms were employed on these selected features and on the basis of model performance evaluation, it was found that for the complete and driver dataset, XGBoost performs the best for a subset of 25 and 20 genes, respectively. Out of these 45 genes from the two datasets,

Indexed as

AUC, Area under the ROC curveBrCa, Breast cancerCOSMIC, The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancerCX-25, Complete XgBoost top 25DE, Differential ExpressionDifferential gene expressionDistant-metastasis free survivalDMFS, Distasnt metastasis free survivalDX-20, Driver XgBoost top 20EMT, Epithelial to mesenchymal transitionER, Oestrogen ReceptorFDR, False discovery rateGEO, Gene expression omnibousHER2, Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2KM, Kaplan MeierkNN, k Nearest neighborsML, Machine learningNSCLC, Non small cell lung carcinomaOS, Overall survivalPCA, Principal component analysisPOU2AF1Prognostic gene signaturesPR, Progesterone receptorRFE, Recursive feature eliminationRF, Random forestROC, Receiver operating characteristics curveS100BSVM, Support vector machineTNBCTNBC, Triple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID35465161
PMCPMC9014315

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.