Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35467176›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2022

Evaluation of an extracorporeal ozone-based bactericide system for the treatment of Escherichia coli sepsis.

Paul Skorup, Anette Fransson, Jenny Gustavsson, Johan Sjöholm, Henrik Rundgren, Volkan Özenci, Alicia Y W Wong, Tomas Karlsson, Christer Svensén, Mattias Günther

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The anesthesiologist's guide to swine trauma physiology research: a report of two decades of experience from the experimental traumatology laboratory.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paul SkorupSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anette FranssonSection for Experimental Traumatology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum - 8B, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jenny GustavssonSection for Experimental Traumatology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum - 8B, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan SjöholmSangair AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik RundgrenSangair AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Volkan ÖzenciDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Alicia Y W WongDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Tomas KarlssonDepartment of Clinical Science at Education Södersjukhuset, Unit of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christer SvensénDepartment of Clinical Science at Education Södersjukhuset, Unit of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mattias GüntherSection for Experimental Traumatology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Biomedicum - 8B, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. mattias.gunther@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2372-6114
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is associated with substantial mortality rates. Antibiotic treatment is crucial, but global antibiotic resistance is now classified as one of the top ten global public health risks facing humanity. Ozone (O

methodsThe E. coli strain B09-11822, a clinical isolate from a patient with septic shock was used. The in vitro study treated E. coli infected human whole blood (n = 6) with ozone. The in vivo 3.5-h sepsis model randomized swine to E. coli infusion and ozone treatment (n = 5) or E. coli infusion and no ozone treatment (n = 5). Live E. coli, 5 × 10

resultsThe single pass in vitro treatment decreased E. coli by 27%, mean 1941 to 1422 CFU/mL, mean of differences - 519.0 (95% CI - 955.0 to - 82.98, P = 0.0281). pO

conclusionsOzone decreased the concentration of viable E. coli in human whole blood. The system was technically feasible and physiologically tolerable in porcine sepsis/septic shock and should be considered for further studies towards clinical applications.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistanceE. coliIntensive careOzonePorcine sepsis model

Identifiers

PMID35467176
PMCPMC9038973
OpenAlexW4224309527

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.