ArticlePsychology and aging2022
Subjective views of aging in very old age: Predictors of 2-year change in gains and losses.
Article in Psychology and aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gauging the link between different views of aging facets and their associations with cognitive and mood functioning in midlife and older age: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Levels and changes in cognitive, mental, and physical health as correlates of attitudes to aging in very old age.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Relationship Between Accelerated Biological Aging, Race, Perceived Discrimination, and Limitations in Activities of Daily Living.International journal of geriatrics and gerontology · 2025Article
- Successful Aging and Subjective Aging: Toward a Framework to Research a Neglected Connection.The Gerontologist · 2024Review
- The Role of Awareness of Age-Related Change in the Longitudinal Association between Pain and Physical Activity.International journal of aging & human development · 2024Article
- Differential Item Functioning Along the Old Age Continuum: Contrasting Chronological Age With Contextual Variables in the Assessment of Gains and Losses Across Advanced Old Age.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024Article
- The Relationship between Subjective Aging and Cognition in Elderly People: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Awareness of Age-Related Gains and Losses in a National Sample of Adults Aged 80 Years and Older: Cross-Sectional Associations With Health Correlates.Innovation in aging · 2023Article
- Editorial: International evidence on predictors and outcomes of awareness of age-related change.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Has the COVID-19 pandemic affected older adults' personal and general views on aging? Evidence for losses and gains.Developmental psychology · 2022Article
- Awareness of Age-Related Changes Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Longitudinal Trajectories, and the Role of Age Stereotypes and Personality Traits.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined trajectories of awareness of age-related change (AARC; Diehl & Wahl, 2010) across 2 years in a large representative sample of very old adults. We also examined the predictive role of health, functional status, cognitive functioning, and engagement with life for AARC change. The initial sample comprised 1,863 individuals aged 80 years or older. Of the 1,612 individuals recontacted 2 years later, 912 took part in the follow-up. Measures included the AARC-Short Form, assessing perceived AARC Gains and AARC Losses. Measures of multimorbidity and functional health, a cognitive screening test, and indicators of engagement with life (e.g., leisure activity) were examined as predictors of AARC change, using semi-cross-lagged fixed effects modeling. Higher overall levels of AARC Gains were observed compared to AARC Losses for all but respondents aged 90 years or older. Intra-individual levels of AARC Gains decreased significantly over the 2-year period, whereas a significant increase was found for AARC Losses. AARC Losses across time were predicted by loss of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) independence, but not by change in multimorbidity, cognitive performance, or engagement with life. One indicator of engagement with life, reduced leisure activity, predicted smaller AARC Gains at wave 2. These results were robust in models controlling for potential reverse causation. These findings suggest that a significant increase in perceived AARC Losses appears to be an inherent characteristic of very old age. Very old age may be a stage in life in which changes in multimorbidity and cognitive performance no longer impact individuals' views on aging. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.