Evidence mapPaperPMID 35470686Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Coronary Flow Variations Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Affect Diastolic Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios More Than the Whole Cycle Ratios.

Muhammad Aetesam-Ur-Rahman, Tian X Zhao, Kitty Paques, Joana Oliveira, Bharat Khialani, Stephen Kyranis, Denise M Braganza, Sarah C Clarke, Martin R Bennett, Nick E J West and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Muhammad Aetesam-Ur-RahmanDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.
Tian X ZhaoDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0202-5255
Kitty PaquesDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.
Joana OliveiraDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8723-670X
Bharat KhialaniDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0841-2969
Stephen KyranisDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.
Denise M BraganzaDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.
Sarah C ClarkeDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.
Martin R BennettDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Cambridge United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2565-1825
Nick E J WestDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.
Stephen P HooleDepartment of Interventional Cardiology Royal Papworth Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3530-3808

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/2000003/12800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve ≥0.90 is an accepted marker of procedural success, and a cutoff of ≥0.95 has recently been proposed for post-PCI instantaneous wave-free ratio. However, stability of nonhyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) post-PCI is not well characterized, and transient reactive submaximal hyperemia post-PCI may affect their precision. We performed this study to assess stability and reproducibility of NHPRs post-PCI. Methods and Results Fifty-seven patients (age, 63.77±10.67 years; men, 71%) underwent hemodynamic assessment immediately post-PCI and then after a recovery period of 10, 20, and 30 minutes and repeated at 3 months. Manual offline analysis was performed to derive resting and hyperemic pressure indexes (Pd/Pa resting pressure gradient, mathematically derived instantaneous wave-free ratio, resting full cycle ratio, and fractional flow reserve) and microcirculatory resistances (basal microvascular resistance and index of microvascular resistance). Transient submaximal hyperemia occurring post-PCI was demonstrated by longer thermodilution time at 30 minutes compared with immediately post-PCI; mean difference of thermodilution time was 0.17 seconds (95% CI, 0.07-0.26 seconds;

Indexed as

Coronary StenosisFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHyperemiaPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedBlood PressureCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Resultsinstantaneous wave‐free rationonhyperemic pressure ratiospost–percutaneous coronary intervention coronary physiologypost–percutaneous coronary intervention hyperemiaresting full cycle ratio

Identifiers

PMID35470686
PMCPMC9238611

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.