Evidence mapPaperPMID 35471192Full record

Trial reportAnnals of medicine2022

Relative fat mass assessment estimates changes in adiposity among female older adults with obesity after a 12-month exercise and diet intervention.

Katelyn E Senkus, Kristi M Crowe-White, Julie L Locher, Jamy D Ard

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00955903 (Calorie Restriction and Changes in Body Composition, Disease, Function, and Quality of Life in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00955903 phase3completednot on this map

Calorie Restriction and Changes in Body Composition, Disease, Function, and Quality of Life in Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2010 to 2014Enrolled167ConditionsObesity, Diabetes, Hypertension, HyperlipidemiaArmsExercise, Reduced Calorie Diet, Weight Maintenance Diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katelyn E SenkusDepartment of Human Nutrition, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1711-398X
Kristi M Crowe-WhiteDepartment of Human Nutrition, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2497-4582
Julie L LocherDivision of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2639-6459
Jamy D ArdDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1643-6795
University of Alabama · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES/

introductionIt is imperative to accurately estimate whole body fat percentage (%fat) to understand the deleterious nature of excess adiposity on cardiometabolic disease risk. Cost and accessibility often preclude the use of advanced imaging methods like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Relative fat mass (RFM) is an emerging estimator of whole body %fat based on waist circumference, height, and biological sex. The purpose of this ancillary study was to examine the relationship between RFM and gold-standard measures of adiposity among community-dwelling older adults with obesity and to evaluate if changes in RFM reflect changes in %fat following a 12-month lifestyle intervention (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00955903). PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants (

resultsRFM was significantly positively correlated with DXA whole body %fat and DXA trunk %fat at baseline. Equivalence testing revealed that RFM was considered equivalent to DXA whole body %fat for females only. Additionally, from baseline to 12 months, a significant reduction in RFM was observed among female participants in the exercise + energy restriction group only. Changes in RFM were significantly correlated with changes in DXA whole body %fat, DXA trunk fat, and total abdominal fat tissue determined by MRI.

conclusionResults support the use of RFM as an estimate of whole body %fat where advanced imaging techniques are not feasible. Furthermore, results suggest that this index is sensitive to changes in fat mass over 12 months in female older adults with obesity. KEY MESSAGESRelative fat mass (RFM), an emerging estimator of whole body %fat based on waist circumference, height, and biological sex, was intentionally developed to be a simple estimate of adiposity that overcomes limitations of measures like body mass index.In the current study, results from correlations and agreement analyses support the use of RFM to estimate whole-body fat percentage in a community-dwelling older adult population with obesity when advanced methods, namely dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, are not feasible.Significant reductions in RFM were also observed over a 12-month period that was significantly correlated with changes in whole body fat percentage; thus, supporting the sensitivity of RFM to lifestyle changes.

Indexed as

AdiposityObesityAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedBody Mass IndexDietFemaleHumansMalecardiometabolic diseasedual-energy X-ray absorptiometryolder adultsRelative fat masstotal body fat

Identifiers

PMID35471192
PMCPMC9126590
OpenAlexW4224885365

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.