Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35475627›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022

How Do Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations Affect Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Who Underwent Different Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

Kongyong Cui, Dong Yin, Chenggang Zhu, Weihua Song, Hongjian Wang, Lei Jia, Rui Zhang, Haoyu Wang, Zhongxing Cai, Lei Feng and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lipoprotein(a) at a "Tipping Point": case to move to universal screening.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kongyong CuiCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-2313-5368
Dong YinCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Chenggang ZhuCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Weihua SongCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Hongjian WangCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Lei JiaCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Rui ZhangCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Haoyu WangCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Zhongxing CaiCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Lei FengCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Kefei DouCardiometabolic Medicine Center Department of Cardiology Fuwai HospitalNational Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular DiseaseChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-8372-6338
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) plays an important role in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease through its proatherogenic and prothrombotic effects. We hypothesized that prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) might be beneficial for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who had elevated Lp(a) levels. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Lp(a) on the efficacy and safety of prolonged DAPT versus shortened DAPT in stable patients with coronary artery disease who were treated with a drug-eluting stent. Methods and Results We selected 3201 stable patients with CAD from the prospective Fuwai Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry, of which 2124 patients had Lp(a) ≤30 mg/dL, and 1077 patients had Lp(a) >30 mg/dL. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to Lp(a) levels and the duration of DAPT therapy (≤1 year versus >1 year). The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The median follow-up time was 2.5 years. Among patients with elevated Lp(a) levels, DAPT >1 year presented lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event and definite/probable stent thrombosis compared with DAPT ≤1 year. In contrast, in patients with normal Lp(a) levels, the risks of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event and definite/probable stent thrombosis were not significantly different between the DAPT >1 year and DAPT ≤1 year groups. Prolonged DAPT had 2.4-times higher risk of clinically relevant bleeding than shortened DAPT in patients with normal Lp(a) levels, although without statistical difference. Conclusions In stable patients with coronary artery disease, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent, prolonged DAPT was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events among those with elevated Lp(a) levels, whereas it did not show statistically significant evidence of benefit for reducing ischemic events and tended to increase clinically relevant bleeding among those with normal Lp(a) levels.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansLipoprotein(a)Platelet Aggregation InhibitorsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLipoprotein(a)Platelet Aggregation Inhibitorsclinical outcomecoronary artery diseasedrug‐eluting stentdual antiplatelet therapylipoprotein(a)percutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID35475627
PMCPMC9238589
OpenAlexW4225007743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.